JOSE S. GALVEZ, DECEASED (REPRESENTED BY HIS WIDOW AND HEIR), GRACIA VDA. DE GALVEZ, PETITIONER, VS. PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY AND THE COURT OP INDUSTRIAL RELAT…

Petitioner
herein, Gracia Vda. de Galvez, hereafter referred to as Mrs. Galvez, is
the widow of the late Jose S. Galvez, who, during his lifetime was an
employee of respondent Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company,
hereafter referred to as the Company. Mr. Galvez had worked therefor
from December 1, 190B to December 31, 1941, when the operation of the
Company was disrupted by the Japanese invasion and occupation of the
Philippines. As of the date last mentioned, he had served the Company
for thirty-three (33) years and one (1) month. Upon the liberation of
the Philippines, or on April 1, 1945, Mr. Galvez was reinstated and
continued under the em- ployment of the Company for another five (5)
years, ten (10) months and six (6) days, or up to February 7, 1951,
when he died. Thus, his prewar and post-war services to the Company
aggregated thirty-eight (38) years, eleven (11) months and six (6)
days. Sometime in 1951, Mrs. Galvez received from the Company P24,000,
as pension and death benefits due to the deceased under an Employees’
Pension Plan adopted by the Company on September 18, 1923.

Subsequently,
or on December 22,1951, Crispin Jeturian and about sixty-three (63)
other persons, who had served the Company as its prewar employees,
instituted in the Court of Industrial Relations a proceeding for the
collection of their proportionate shares in said Employees’ Pension
Plan, which had been discontinued by a resolution dated November 6,
1945, unilaterally taken by the Board of Directors of the Company, to
be effective retroactively as of January 1, 1942. In due course, a
decision was, on February 23, 1954, rendered in said proceeding,
docketed as Case No. 639-V of the Court of Industrial Relations,
directing payment to the petitioners therein of their respective
proportionate shares in the aforementioned Employees’ Pension Plan, as
well as—to those who had not received their 30-day notice of dismissal
from the service of the Company before the resumption of its business
operations in 1946—a severance pay equivalent to one-month salary. With
a slight modification, immaterial to the case at bar, said decision was
affirmed by the Supreme Court in Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co.
vs. Jeturian, et al., G. R. No. Lr-7756, decided on June 20, 1955.

Later
on, the Court of Industrial Relations ordered ita chief examiner to
liquidate said prewar pension plan. By an order dated May 12, 1956, the
report thereon of said chief examiner was approved by the Court of
Industrial Relations. The report specified the names of all prewar
employees entitled to participate in the distribution of the Employees’
Pension fund and the amount each was entitled to. It included the name
of several persons not petitioners in the case, whose aggregate share
was said to be P23,381.96. Among these persons was Jose S. Galvez whose
share, forming part of the sum last mentioned, amounted to P13,028.64.
Thereafter, said non-petitioners, including Mrs. Galvez, on behalf of
her deceased spouse, asked the Court of Industrial Relations to order
the payment of their aforementioned shares, according to the examiner’s
report. Despite the opposition of the Company, predicated upon the
theory that these claimants were not parties to the proceeding and
could not invoke, therefore, the benefits of the aforementioned
decisions (of the Court of Industrial Relations, of February 23, 1954,
and of the Supreme Court, promulgated on June 20, 1955), the Court of
Industrial Relations issued an order, dated January 8, 1959, granting
said request and directing the Company to deposit with the cashier of
said Court, within a specified time, the aforementioned sum of
P23,381.96, exclusive of service fee. On motion for reconsideration
filed by the Company, said order was affirmed by the Court of
Industrial Relations, sitting en banc, in a resolution dated
February 14, 1959. Thereupon, or on or about February 28, 1959, the
Company filed with this Court a petition, docketed as G. R. No.
L-15120, for review by certiorari of said order and the aforementioned
resolution of the Court of Industrial Relations, dated January 8, and
February 14, 1959, respectively, but the petition was dismissed by
resolution of this Court of March 17, 1959, for lack of merit.

Presently,
or on April 14, 1959, the Company filed with the Court of Industrial
Relations a petition praying that it be no longer required to deposit
the aforementioned share of Jose S. Galvez in the amount of P13,028.64,
because Mrs. Galvez had already been paid P24,000, as above stated,
inasmuch as, at the time of his death, Mr. Galvez was receiving a
monthly compensation of P2,000 and under the rules governing the
Employees’ Pension Plan, he would have received only the salary for six
(6) months, or P12,000, for his post liberation services, which were
over five (5) years but less than ten (10) years, but was given the
benefit of a provision prescribing a 12-month pay for those who had
served ten (10) years or over, in view of his prewar services. By an
order dated September 8, 1959, the Court of Industrial Relations held
that amounts collectible by Jose S. Galvez under said pension plan for
his prewar and post-liberation services were P13,028.64 and P12,000,
respectively, or the aggregate sum of P25,028.64, and that since Mrs.
Galvez had already received P24,000, the sum now due her is only
P1,028.64, which the Company was ordered to deposit in court.

A reconsideration having been denied by the Court of Industrial Relations sitting en banc,
Mrs. Galvez now seeks a review by certiorari of said order of September
8, 1959, upon the ground that it had in effect amended unlawfully the
aforementioned order of January 8, 1959, which was already final and
executory. By way of justification for the action complained of, the
lower court stated in its order of September 8, 1959.

“The
order of this Court dated May 12, 1956, approving the Report of
Examiner in which the equities of all employees of the respondent
company were determined in accordance with the decision of this Court
in Case No. 639-V, Crispin Jeturian, et al. vs. Philippine
Long Distance Telephone Co., as modified by the Supreme Court in G. R.
No. L-7756, Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company vs. Crispin
Jeturian, et al., recognizes the equity in favor of Jose S. Galvez in
the pre-war pension plan, although his name was not specifically
mentioned as one of the petitioners in said Case No. 639-V, being one
of the employees of said company. The order of this Court of July 8,
1959 in the instant incidental case implements said Report of Examiner,
thus giving effectively to the award in favor of Jose S. Galvez. We
believe that this Court may in its sound discretion, after
discovering—through hearings as was done in this case—a certain error
which might do injustice to the aggrieved party if not corrected, alter
or modify its order to accord substantial justice to the party
concerned during the effectivity of an award, order or decision.”

The
lower court was thus aware of the fact that it was thereby altering or
modifying its order of January 8, 1959. Regardless of the excellence of
the motive for acting as it did, we are constrained to hold, however,
that the lower court had no. authority to make said alteration or
modification. The order of January 8, 1959, awarding P13,028.64 to Jose
S. Galvez, was affirmed by the Court of Industrial Relations sitting en banc, and an appeal by certiorari from said order and from the confirmatory resolution of said Court en banc
was dismissed by this Court, for lack of merit. As a consequence, said
order of January 8, 1959 and the award of P13,028.64 in favor of Jose
S. Galvez became executory and are no longer subject to alteration or
modification (Rattan Art & Decorations, Inc. vs. Rattan Art & Decorations (Daily Workers) Union, G. R. No. L-6466, May 21, 1954; Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of the P.I. vs. Philippine Labor Organization, 88 Phil., 147).

The
equitable considerations that led the lower court to take the action
complained of cannot offset the demands of public policy and public
interest—which are also responsive to the tenets of equity—requiring
that all issues passed upon in decisions or final orders that have
become executory, be deemed conclusively disposed of and definitely
closed, for, otherwise, there would be no end to litigations, thus
setting at naught the main role of courts of justice, which is to
assist in the enforcement of the rule of law and the maintenance of
peace and order, by settling justiciable controversies with finality.

Wherefore,
the order appealed from is hereby set aside and another one shall be
entered directing that within thirty (30) days from entry of judgment
in this case, the sum of P13,028.64, exclusive of service fee, be
deposited by respondent Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. with the
Court of Industrial Relations for the benefit of the heirs of Jose S.
Galvez, with costs against said respondent. It is so ordered.

Bengzon, C. J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J. B. L., Paredes, Dizon and De Leon, JJ., concur.