G.R. No. 107458. October 14, 1994
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. SGT. HERMES DALANON, ACCUSED-APPELLANT, GODELIO MONSALES, SALVADOR ALBAO ALIAS “BADOY,” (AT LARGE) AND JOHN DOE (AT LARGE) ACC…
PUNO, J.:
Sgt. Hermes Dalanon, Godelio Monsales, Salvador Albao alias “Badoy,” and a John Doe were
charged before the Regional Trial Court of Masbate[1] with
ATTEMPTED ROBBERY with MULTIPLE HOMICIDE,[2] in an
Information dated April 22, 1991, which reads:
“That on or about February 17, 1991 in the evening thereof at
Barangay Asid, Municipality of Masbate, Province of Masbate, Philippines,
within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, all
armed with deadly weapons, conspiring together and confederating with another
whose true name and identity is still unknown, with intent to gain, by means of
violence and intimidation, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and
feloniously commence the commission of the crime of Robbery directly by overt
acts, to wit: by then and there
demanding money from the spouses RODRIGO and FELICIDAD REJUSO but the said
accused were not able to perform all the acts of execution which would have
produced the crime of Robbery as a consequence, by reason of causes other than
their own spontaneous desistance, that is the said spouses refused and/or
denied having money, and pursuant to the same conspiracy, with intent to kill,
by means of treachery, said accused, did then and there, willfully, unlawfully
and feloniously help each other attack, assault and hack, with a bolo, RODRIGO
his wife FELICIDAD and their children, SHEILA and REBECCA, all surnamed REJUSO,
inflicting upon them several wounds in different parts of the body which caused
their instantaneous death; that before killing their victims, the said accused
gained entrance into the victims’ dwelling by pretending to ask for a glass of
water but once inside, they tied the hands of the victims and raped REBECCA
REJUSO before killing her.
Committed with the aggravating
circumstances of rape, dwelling, band, treachery and craft.
CONTRARY TO LAW.”[3]
Salvador Albao and a certain
John Doe remain at-large and cannot be located.
Upon arraignment, the remaining two (2) accused pleaded not
guilty and were tried. During the
pendency of the case, accused Godelio Monsales escaped from the Masbate
Provincial Jail.[4]
He was later found dead at Sitio Bagalihog, Kinamaligan, Masbate on June 12,
1992.[5]
The prosecution evidence came principally from the testimony of
the lone survivor of the carnage, OLIVER
CERVANTES.[6] Sometime in November 1990, spouses
Rodrigo and Felicidad Rejuso hired him as househelper and caretaker of their
small pakwan plantation in Barangay Asid, Masbate, Masbate.[7]
Cervantes testified that at around ten o’clock in the evening of
February 17, 1991 while he was about to sleep, Rodrigo called him to pacify the
four (4) barking dogs. With the
illumination from the gas lamp placed on a bottle about five (5) inches tall,[8]
he saw Rodrigo talking to accused-appellant
Sgt. Hermes Dalanon in the balcony.[9]
Accused-appellant Dalanon was in fatigue uniform and he had a pistol tucked on
his waist.[10]
Cervantes went down to drive away the dogs. On the ground, he saw accused Salvador
“Badoy” Albao, Godelio Monsales, and another person whose identity
was unknown to him.[11] They
were all armed with long guns. Albao
requested for a glass of water. As
Cervantes went up the house, Albao, Monsales, and the unidentified third person
followed him. He gave the glass of
water to Albao who drank it. Immediately thereafter, Albao ordered Cervantes at gun point to lie face
down on the bamboo flooring. Rodrigo
asked accused-appellant Dalanon if they had committed any wrong but Albao
replied with a kick.[12]
Albao sought Felicidad and her two (2) daughters, Rebecca and Sheila, from
their rooms. They were also ordered to
lie flat on the floor.
Albao then tied the hands of Rodrigo, Felicidad, and Sheila at
their backs with straws.[13] He
also pig-tied Rebecca’s hands with her own belt.[14] They
were ordered by accused-appellant Dalanon to sit down.
At this juncture, Albao demanded money from Felicidad but in
vain. She told him they had none, as
they even sold their “shellane.”[15]
Albao was infuriated. He struck
Felicidad on the head with a bolo.
In the meantime, accused-appellant Dalanon ordered Rebecca to sit
in front of him. He started to sexually
molest her. He caressed her back and
her breast. He told her, “Ayaw ka
hadlok, adi ako.”[16]
Disappointed that the Rejusos had no money, Albao brought Rodrigo
downstairs. He had his gun slung on his
shoulder while he held the bolo in his hand. Cervantes then heard Rodrigo’s painful moan of “adoy.”[17]
Upon the instigation of accused-appellant Dalanon, Felicidad was also taken
downstairs by Monsales. Albao was
waiting for them on the ground. Cervantes then heard “chopping sounds.”[18]
It was the turn of Cervantes to be brought down. He was dragged down by the person he did
know. He pleaded for his life.[19]
He was told to keep silent. On the
ground, he was dumbfounded when he saw Rodrigo and Felicidad Rejuso sprawled
dead. Sensing that Albao and Monsales
were some two (2) meters away from him, he ran away.[20]
They pursued him and fired at him.[21] He
stumbled on the ground and hid among the tall grasses. His pursuers missed him in the darkness of
the evening.
He waited until two o’clock in the morning to make his next
move. Cervantes then rushed to the
house of Bonifacio Cañares, eldest brother of Felicidad Cañares Rejuso. Bonifacio untied the nylon from his hands.[22]
He informed Bonifacio about the tragedy that befell them.
Promptly, Bonifacio and Cervantes went to the house of the
Barangay Captain of Malinta, Cornelio Carles. Carles in turn accompanied them to the Masbate Police Station. Lt. Perfecto Delima, C1C Jimmy Rabiliona, C1C Rene Ojeda, C1C Ygusquiza, SPO
Elner Antang, Pat. Alex Baldeo,
Pat. Mario Danao III, Station Official Photographer, Barangay Captain Carles,
and Bonifacio Cañares went with Cervantes to the scene of the crime.[23]
They saw the lifeless bodies of Rodrigo, Felicidad, Rebecca, and Sheila bathed
in their own blood. They recovered a
bolo stained with blood and hair fibers behind the house of the victims.[24]
Still horrified, Cervantes narrated the gruesome incident to Col.
Silas Laurio at the Municipal Building of Masbate. He named accused-appellant Hermes Dalanon and Salvador
“Badoy” Albao as two (2) of the perpetrators of the crime. SPO Elner Antang prepared the necessary
Police Blotter Report.[25]
A day after, or on February 19, 1991, Cervantes identified
accused-appellant Dalanon and Monsales from a police line-up composed of about
thirty (30) persons at the PNP Headquarters, Camp Bonny Serrano, Masbate.[26]
The defense had a different story to tell.
Accused-appellant SGT.
HERMES DALANON[27]
is a member of the PC-INP Masbate Command and assigned as Deputy Commander at
Barangay Malinta, Masbate. He alleged
that on February 17, 1991, he along with Godelio Monsales, and Nicolas
Cervantes escorted Engr. Jaime Bravo, Mrs. Bella Dalanon Panes Bravo, and their
son Benjie to Rancho Bravo in Asid.[28]
After Mrs. Bravo paid the wages of their workers, they proceeded to Nabungsuran
Ranch. They arrived there at 11:00
o’clock in the evening.[29] The
party then left at 2:00 o’clock in the morning for Bacolod, Milagros, Masbate.[30]
They had breakfast at his residence in Bacolod. After which, they sent-off the Bravo family to the Masbate
Airport for their flight to Manila.
Exhausted by the trip, he returned to the bunkhouse of Rancho
Bravo to rest. He was surprised when he
was implicated in the killings of the Rejuso family. More so, when he was made to join the police line-up at Camp
Bonny Serrano on February 19, 1991. Lt.
Delima then ordered him and his men, Godelio Monsales, Igmedio Mangubat, Efren
Candidato, and Esteban Mirrales to be disarmed.[31]
Accused GODELIO
MONSALES[32] is a member of the Civilian
Volunteer Organization (CVO) under the supervision of accused-appellant
Dalanon. He was hired as an inspector of the barb wire fence
of the ranches of Engr. Bravo.[33] He
claimed that on the night of February 19, 1991, he was with the group of Engr.
Bravo. They left Asid Ranch at eight
o’clock in the evening bound for Nabungsuran Ranch at Aroroy, Masbate.
On the other hand, accused SALVADOR “BADOY” ALBAO was once a member of the
CVO. He was also under the supervision
of accused-appellant Dalanon. Late in
December 1990, he ceased to report to the unit after he was disarmed.[34]
Defense witness BELLA DALANON PANES BRAVO[35]
corroborated the testimonies of the accused. She alleged that Engr. Bravo had requested Col. Antero Javier,
the Provincial Commander of Masbate to provide them military escorts in their
trips to Masbate. On February 15, 1991,
accused-appellant Dalanon, Monsales, and Nicolas escorted them in paying the wages
of their ranch workers in Asid and Nabungsuran.[36]
In due course, a Decision
was rendered convicting the accused of the crime charged, viz:
“WHEREFORE, the Court finds the accused, Hermes Dalanon
and Godillo (sic) Monsales guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of
Attempted Robbery with Multiple Homicide committed with the aggravating
circumstances of treachery, dwelling and rape and hereby sentences each one of
said accused, Hermes Dalanon and Godillo (sic) Monsales to suffer the penalty
of RECLUSION PERPETUA together with its accessory penalties and to pay jointly
and solidarily the heirs of the late Rodrigo Rejuso, Felicidad Rejuso, Rebecca
Rejuso and Sheila Rejuso the amount of Fifty Thousand (P50,000.00) Pesos each
without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency and to pay the
proportionate cost.
SO ORDERED.“[37]
Only accused-appellant Dalanon assailed his conviction. In this appeal, he contends that the lower
court erred:
I
[I]N
NOT BELIEVING THE TESTIMONY OF APPELLANT, AS CORROBORATED BY WITNESSES,
THAT AT THE TIME THE CRIME WAS BEING COMMITTED HE WAS AT NABUNGSURAN, FIFTY-TWO
KILOMETERS AWAY FROM THE SCENE OF THE CRIME.
II
[I]N CONCLUDING THAT ALLEGED
LONE-EYEWITNESS HAD POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED APPELLANT AS ONE OF THE PERPETRATORS
OF THIS HEINOUS CRIME.
II
[I]N BASING ITS DECISION ON THE TESTIMONY
OF OLIVER CERVANTES, THE ALLEGED LONE-EYEWITNESS TO THIS GORY CRIME.
We affirm the conviction of accused-appellant Dalanon.
Essentially, the case involves calibration of the credibility of
witnesses. Prosecution witness Oliver
Cervantes has identified accused-appellant Dalanon as one of the perpetrators of the crime. On the other hand, said accused-appellant
has denied his presence at the scene of the crime when it was committed.
We give credence to
the testimony of witness Cervantes which is positive and clear. He even passed in the crucible of a voir dire.[38] Thus, he testified:
x x
x x x x x
x x
(Branch Clerk of Court to Oliver Cervantes)
“Q : Do
you swear to tell the truth regarding your knowledge in this case?
A : Yes, sir.
Q : And who was that
somebody he (Rodrigo) was talking to?
A : Its Hermes DaIanon.[39]
Q : When you drove the dogs away, what happened?
A : That was the time I saw Salvador Albao
outside with Monsales and the other person whose name I do not know.[40]
Q : What happened after the five (5) of you were
lying face down?
A : The five of us were tied up.[41]
Q : What happened after that?
A : Then Salvador Albao asked the money to
Felicidad.[42]
Q : And what did Felicidad Rejuso answer?
A : Felicidad answered, that we are sorry
because we have no money. We even sold
our shellane because we have nothing at all.
Q : And what happened after Felicidad made those
pleas?
A : Salvador Albao immediately struck Felicidad
on her head with the bolo.
Q : So Salvador Albao is now also armed with a
bolo?
A : The bolo came from that same house, the
house of Rejuso.
Q : What happened next after Rodrigo Rejuso was
brought down by Salvador Albao and Godelio Monsales?
A : After that I heard from Rodrigo Rejuso a
painful moaning (adoy). I thought he
was just being struck.[43]
Q : And what happened after Felicidad Rejuso was
brought down by Godelio Monsales?
A : Then after that I just heard sound of
striking.
Q : And what was Sgt. Hermes Dalanon doing while
you were brought down by that person whose name you do not know?
A : He kept on caressing Rebecca Rejuso.”[44]
(On
cross-examination)
“Q : But
it took you sometime to point Sgt. Dalanon?
A : At first I passed him by because I was to
scrutinize and closely identify his
face and after sometime I can identify him.
Q : [W]hen you were passing by the police line-up you cannot be sure whether
or not it was Sgt. Dalanon because you were not able to point him immediately because you point to
Monsales first?
A : I wanted to be sure so, it took me sometime
because he might resemble somebody else.”[45]
Cervantes’ knowledge of the crime at bench is based not only on
his sense of sight but also his sense of
sound. He audibly heard Albao demanding
money from Felicidad. He heard
Rodrigo’s excruciating moans, “adoy.” And, he heard the
“chopping sounds” of death. The physical evidence confirmed the killings of the Rejusos.
Cervantes’ initial reluctance to disclose the names of the
criminals is understandable. Firstly,
the harrowing experience completely upset him. Secondly, he did not want to shock Bonifacio Cañares, eldest brother of
Felicidad Cañares Rejuso. Thirdly, without
any relative from Asid, he was fearful of reprisal from his assailants who were
in the military. Lastly, he did not
trust Reynaldo Villamor because the latter belongs to the unit of
accused-appellant Dalanon. In fact,
Provincial Commander Col. Monforte stopped them from handling the case because
of the involvement of their own men in the crime at bench.
The conduct of Cervantes subsequent to the crime bolsters his
credibility. He immediately accompanied the authorities to the scene of the crime. This prompt action led to the immediate
arrest of two (2) of the killers. This
spontaneous reaction negates any opportunity to concoct falsehoods. Indeed, it is far fetched for Cervantes, a fourth grade, uncouth barrio boy
to falsely impute a heinous crime against accused-appellant Dalanon, a Deputy
Detachment Commander of Asid, Masbate. He had no motive to falsify facts against accused-appellant.
Time and again, we have
ruled that alibi cannot prevail over the positive identification of an accused as
the perpetrator of the crime. To
sustain the defense of alibi, an
accused must not only prove satisfactorily that he was at another place at the
time the crime happened. But more
important, that it was physically impossible for him to be at the scene of the
crime at the time of its commission.[46]
The alibi proffered by
accused-appellant Dalanon does not meet the above test. He himself admitted he was in Asid and
Nabungsuran, Masbate when the slaughter happened. The distance between Rancho Bravo and the locus
criminis, the house of the Rejusos,
is only one (1) kilometer while Nabungsuran Ranch is fifty-two (52) kilometers
away. Since accused-appellant was in
Asid and Nabungsuran from eight o’clock to eleven o’clock in the evening of
February 17, 1991, it was not physically impossible for him to be at the time and place of the crime when
it was committed. His alibi is not air
tight.
The possibility that
Cervantes erred in identifying accused-appellant Dalanon is nil. Accused-appellant Dalanon is not a stranger
to witness Cervantes. Cervantes knew
accused-appellant because the latter sometimes have his manicure done in the
Rejusos’ house. Besides, his outpost is
only five hundred (500) meters from the house of the victims. On that fateful evening, Cervantes vividly
saw accused-appellant because the house was lighted by a gas lamp. Accused-appellant had no mask to hide his
identity. Loose alibi must yield to and
cannot prevail over the positive identification made by Cervantes.[47]
Not much credence should
be given to the testimony of Bella Dalanon Panes Bravo. She is the niece of accused-appellant
Dalanon. Moreover, accused-appellant is
her military escort and the administrator of their ranches. Her testimony has to be taken with a grain
of salt. It is not invulnerable to
bias. Indeed, it taxes credulity why
she has to pay the wages of their cowboys at night in the critical area of
Masbate. Similarly, the testimony of
Reynaldo Villamor is suspect. Accused-appellant Dalanon is the superior of Villamor.
To cap it all, motive for the commission of the crime at bench was established
by prosecution witness OSCAR
REJUSO,[48] the oldest and only son of spouses Rejuso. He averred that his sister Rebecca turned down
accused-appellant’s proposition of love. Accused?appellant is a married man.[49]
The trial court correctly convicted accused-appellant for
attempted robbery with homicide. It is
clear that when Albao demanded money from Felicidad, accused-appellant and his
company had the intention of robbing the Rejuso family. The robbery would have been complete were it
not for the refusal of Felicidad to give money as they had none.
Neither did the trial court err in finding conspiracy among the
accused. Conspiracy need not be proved
by direct evidence of prior agreement to the crime. It could be inferred from the conduct of the accused before,
during, and after the commission of the crime, showing that they acted in
unison with each other, evincing a common purpose or design.[50]
The evidence proved that: Albao and
Monsales brought spouses Rejuso to the ground; Albao butchered them; and
accused-appellant Dalanon did not do anything to stop the killings. Their unity of design is self evident.
We now deal with the
aggravating circumstances that attended the commission of the crime. Dwelling or morada was present because the principal crime took
place in the house of the victims, although the killings were committed outside
thereof. The accused showed
greater perversity in their deliberate invasion of the tranquility of the
Rejuso’s domicile.[51]
Treachery characterized
the commission of the crime. The
victims were first hog-tied to render them incapable of defense.[52]
They were then mercilessly hacked to death.
Rape was likewise established. Prior to Cervantes’ escape, he saw accused-appellant fondling the breast
of Rebecca. The Physical and Medical
Examination Report of Rebecca showed that there was a fresh deep and incomplete
laceration of the hymen corresponding to a 6:00 o’clock position.[53]
It concluded that there was penetration of her private organ.[54]
The Crime Scene Sketch also revealed that human blood stains were found in the
bedroom of Rebecca.[55]
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the judgment of the trial
court, finding accused-appellant HERMES DALANON guilty beyond reasonable doubt
of Attempted Robbery with Homicide, is AFFIRMED in toto. Accused-appellant is sentenced to
suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua[56]
and to pay civil indemnity to the heirs of RODRIGO, FELICIDAD, REBECCA, and
SHEILA REJUSO, in the amount of FIFTY-THOUSAND PESOS (P50,000.00). With costs against accused-appellant.
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J.,
(Chairman), Regalado, and Mendoza, JJ., concur.
Padilla, J., on leave.
[1]
Fifth Judicial Region, Branch 48, Masbate, Masbate.
[2]
Docketed as Criminal Case No. 6334.
*Should be Attempted Robbery with
Homicide. The number of persons killed
in homicide on the occasion of attempted robbery is immaterial. All homicides or murders are merged in the
composite, that is attempted robbery with homicide. Further, the term “homicide” in robbery should be understood as a
generic term.
[3]
Filed by Third Assistant Provincial Prosecutor Danilo V. Ontog; Original
Records pp. 1-2.
[4]
Letter dated January 28, 1992 addressed to the Clerk of Court of the Supreme, Rollo,
p. 45; Manifestation dated May 20, 1993, p. 59.
[5]
Letter dated March 16, 1993 to Julieta Y. Carreon, Clerk of Court (3rd
Division) Supreme Court; Necropsy Report on Godelio Monsales by Dra. Victoria
P. Manalo, MD, Medicolegal Officer, Masbate, Masbate, Rollo p. 49.
[6]
Seventeen (17) years old, single, laborer, and resident of Tugo, Masbate,
Masbate. He finished only Grade
Four. TSN, July 1, 1991, p. 2.
[7]
Ibid., p. 40.
[8]
Ibid., p. 51.
[9]
Ibid.
[10]
Ibid., p. 28.
[11]
Ibid., p. 7.
[12]
Ibid., p. 14.
[13]
Ibid., p. 15.
[14]
Ibid., p. 16.
[15]
Ibid., p. 19.
[16]
Meaning “Do not be afraid for I am here.”
[17]
Ibid., p. 20.
[18]
Ibid., p. 21.
[19]
Ibid., p. 78.
[20]
Ibid.
[21]
Ibid., p. 79.
[22]
Affidavit of Bonifacio Cañares dated February 19, 1991; Original Records, p. 71.
[23]
Exhibit “E”.
[24]
Exhibit “I”; The biochemical examination conducted on the bolo gave
POSITIVE result to the test for the presence of human blood; Original Records,
p. 81.
[25]
Exhibit “D”.
[26]
Exhibit “B”.
[27]
He was the patrol leader of the CAFGUS. Under him were two (2) CAFGUS and five (5) CVO’s all armed with
armalites, carbines, and a garrand. TSN, August 13, 1991, p. 32.
[28]
Ibid., p. 15.
[29]
Ibid., p. 16.
[30]
Ibid., p. 17.
[31]
Ibid., p. 18.
[32]
Thirty (30) years old, married, laborer, and resident of Del Carmen, Unson,
Masbate. TSN October 9, 1991, p. 2.
[33]
Ibid., p. 8.
[34]
Brief for the Appellee, p. 14; Rollo p. 116.
[35]
Forty-one (41) years old, married, businesswoman, and a resident of No. 319,
Katarungan Street, Mandaluyong, Metro Manila. TSN, October 11, 1991, p. 1.
[36]
Ibid., pp. 2-3.
[37]
Penned by Judge Ricardo B. Butalid.
[38]
Words and Phrases, Vol. 44, pp. 598-599.
[39]
TSN, July 1, 1991, p. 5.
[40]
Ibid., p. 7.
[41]
Ibid., p. 15.
[42]
Ibid., p. 19.
[43]
Ibid., p. 20
[44]
Ibid., p. 21.
[45]
Ibid., p. 107.
[46]
People vs. Opiniado Dolar, G.R. No. 100805, March 24, 1994, citing People vs. Villagracia, G.R. No. 94471, March 1, 1993,
219 SCRA 212.
[47]
People vs. Bugho, G.R. No. 91849, September 30, 1991, 202 SCRA 164.
[48]
Twenty-four (24) years old, married, farmer, and resident of Dagusungan,
Milagros Masbate, TSN, October 16, 1991, p. 31.
[49]
Ibid., p. 36.
[50]
People vs. Balanag, G. R. No. 103225, September 15, 1994.
[51]
People vs. Tajon, No. L-47067, April 17, 1984, 128 SCRA 656.
[52]
See People vs. Talaver,
G.R. No. 105390, February 23, 1994.
[53]
Exhibit “N”.
[54]
Supra.
[55]
Exhibit “E”.
[56]
People vs. Perciano, G.R. No. 101576, June 27, 1994.