EDENNA M. RAGANIT, PETITIONER, VS. SUBIC TECHNICS, INC., AND LINDA KUO, GEN. MANAGER, LOUIS KUO, EXEC. V.P., RESPONDENTS.
BUESER, J.:
a. The instant petition did not implead the National Labor Relations Commission as nominal party-respondent;
b. The National Labor Relations Commission was not furnished copy of the petition;
c. The instant petition lacks the required Affidavit of Service;
d. There is no explanation why service on adverse party was not done personally;
e. Herein petitioner merely states in the Verification/Certification against Forum Shopping that the contents in the instant petition are true and correct “to the best of my knowledge and belief” instead of “xxx of his personal knowledge pursuant to Section 4, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court; and
f. Some pertinent pleadings mentioned in the instant petition were not appended therein such as the Complaint, position papers, herein petitioner’s Reply and Appeal Memorandum.
Thus, pursuant to Section 3, Rule 46 of the Rules of Court non compliance with any of the requisites provided therein will result in the dismissal of the petition.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Bruselas, Jr., A.D., Chairman and [*]Paredes, V.I. A., JJ., concur.
[*] Acting Junior Member for fifteen (15) working days only from February 24, 2015 per Office Order No. 55-15-ABR dated February 23, 2015.