PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ALLAN VALDERAMA Y DE VERA, DANTE GARCIA Y MONTECILLO AND NOEL ATIENZA Y SANGA ACCUSED-APPELLANTS.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions FORMER SIXTH DIVISION BALTAZAR-PADILLA, J.:
BALTAZAR-PADILLA, J.:
Dissatisfied with OUR Decision of October 16, 2104 accused-appellants now pleads for its reconsideration through a motion which was opposed by plaintiff-appellee
[1] PCIB vs. Escolin, 67 SCRA 202
A perusal of the said motion glaringly reveals that it merely reiterates the arguments earlier raised which had all been squarely addressed and resolved by this Court in the assailed Decision.
A motion for reconsideration which does not make out new matter sufficiently persuasive to induce modification of judgment will be denied.[1] A party desiring to have a resolution reconsidered should point out facts or points which were not considered in the resolution.[2]
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, the subject Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Tijam, N.G., Chairperson, and Reyes-Carpio, A., JJ., concur.
[1] PCIB vs. Escolin, 67 SCRA 202
[2] De los Angeles vs. Court of Appeals, 60 SCRA 116