BANKARD, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ROEHL S. JORGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions SPECIAL TWELFTH DIVISION DICDICAN, J.:
DICDICAN, J.:
It appears that the defendant-appellant was required by the Clerk
of Court of this Court to file his Appellant’s Brief as early as on
September 2, 2013. However, the defendant-appellant has, up to the date
hereof, not filed such appellant’s brief. He requested for extension of
time for him to file such brief which this Court granted twice but he
failed to comply with his undertaking.
[*] Acting Senior Member vice J. Elbinias per Office Order No. 239-14-ABR dated May 23, 2014
of Court of this Court to file his Appellant’s Brief as early as on
September 2, 2013. However, the defendant-appellant has, up to the date
hereof, not filed such appellant’s brief. He requested for extension of
time for him to file such brief which this Court granted twice but he
failed to comply with his undertaking.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing premises, we hereby consider the appeal filed in this case as ABANDONED and DISMISSED pursuant to Section 1(e) of Rule 50 of the Rules of Court.
SO ORDERED.
Antonio-Valenzuela[*] and Paredes, JJ., concur.
[*] Acting Senior Member vice J. Elbinias per Office Order No. 239-14-ABR dated May 23, 2014