SPS. MARCELO R. MARQUINEZ AND VIOLETA N. MARQUINEZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. SPS. ALBERT K. DIOMAMPO AND JOSEPHINE M. DIOMAMPO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions FORMER NINTH DIVISION REYES, JR., J.C., J.:
REYES, JR., J.C., J.:
For resolution is the Motion for Reconsideration
(Rollo, pp. 88-100) filed by defendants-appellees praying for the
reconsideration of the September 26, 2013 Decision (Rollo, pp. 76-84) of
this Court.
(Rollo, pp. 88-100) filed by defendants-appellees praying for the
reconsideration of the September 26, 2013 Decision (Rollo, pp. 76-84) of
this Court.
After carefully considering the grounds raised in the subject
motion, We find that the reasons and the arguments in support thereof
have been amply treated, discussed and passed upon in the subject
decision. The additional arguments proffered therein constitute no
cogent or compelling reason to modify, much less reverse, it.
WHEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED for lack of merit.
SO ORDERED.
Lopez and Inting, JJ., concur.