AIMEE WONG YAP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, VS. JAMES EDWIN GALSOTE TING, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions April 23, 2014 FORMER FOURTEENTH DIVISION SADANG, J.:
SADANG, J.:
For resolution is respondent-appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration[1] assailing this Court’s Decision dated April 23, 2014, the fallo of which reads:
[1] Rollo, pp.107-113.
WHEREFORE, the appeal is DENIED. The Decision dated July 14, 2010 of the Regional Trial Court of Angeles City, Branch 59, in Special Civil Action No. 09-277 is AFFIRMED in toto.
SO ORDERED.
On July 11, 2014, plaintiff-appellee, the Office of the Solicitor General, filed its Comment[2] on the motion for reconsideration.
After a thorough scrutiny of the arguments interposed by respondent-appellant, We find and so hold, that there exists no cogent reason for us to modify, much less reverse and deviate from our previous findings and conclusions reached in our decision.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Librea-Leagogo, (Chairperson), and Diamante, JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp.107-113.
[2] Id., p. 118.