ADOLFO BERNALES, LEO BERNALES, ALVIN BERNALES, EVANGELINE BERNALES, AND HELEN BERNALES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, VS. RURAL BANK OF SAN FERNANDO (CS), INC., INOCENCIA ISIDRO, TORIB…
BALTAZAR-PADILLA, J.:
A perusal of the said motion glaringly reveals that it merely reiterates the arguments earlier raised which had all been squarely addressed and resolved by this Court.
A motion for reconsideration which does not make out new matter sufficiently persuasive to induce modification of judgment will be denied.[1] A party desiring to have a resolution reconsidered should point out facts or points which were not considered in the resolution.[2]
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, the subject Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
[*]Salvador, R.G., Acting Chairperson and Reyes-Carpio, A., JJ., concur.
[*] Acting Chairperson vice J. Vicente who retired from the service, as per raffle of Dec. 6, 2013
[**] New Ponente vice J. Vicente who retired from the service, as per raffle of Dec. 6, 2013
[1] PCIB vs. Escolin, 67 SCRA 202
[2] De los Angeles vs. Court of Appeals, 60 SCRA 116