FRANCISCA ORAPA-SOLLORANO, TERESITA ORAPA, HEIRS OF FELIPE ORAPA ET. AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, VS. LORLENE THERESA A. GONZALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

1. Ex-Parte Manifestation^[1] dated 4 August 2014 filed by defendant-appellee Lorlene Theresa A. Gonzales (Gonzales);
2. Letter^[2] dated 8 August 2014 from Court Interpreter Nancy Cedeno of Regional Trial Court, Branch 14, Davao City;
3. Compliance^[3] dated 6 August 2014 filed by plaintiffs- appellants Francisca Orapa-Sollorano et al. (Orapa- Sollorano).

Acting on the plaintiffs-appellants Orapa-Sollorano’s Manifestation dated 6 January 2014 and Supplemental Manifestation dated 9 May 2014, the Court declares that the record is now complete.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Orapa-Sollano are directed to file three (3) legibly typewritten, mimeographed or printed copies of their Appellants’ Brief, together with legible copies of the assailed decision of the court a quo and proof of service thereof upon defendant-appellee Gonzales.^[4]

Defendant-Appellee Gonzales is given forty-five (45) days from receipt of the Appellant’s Brief to file three (3) copies of legibly typewritten, mimeographed or printed brief with proof of service of two (2) copies thereof upon plaintiffs-appellants Orapa-Sollano, to which the latter may file their Reply Brief within twenty (20) days from receipt of defendant-appellee’s Brief.^[5]

SO ORDERED.

Borja, J., Chairperson, and Badelles, JJ., concur.

^[2] Rollo, pp. 36-37.

^[3] Rollo, p. 38.

^[4] Section 7, Rule 44 of the Rules of Court.

^[5] Sections 8 and 9, Rule 44 of the Rules of Court.