G. R. No. 8593. September 11, 1914

FRANCISCO T. RAMOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. JUAN ABRAHAM, JR., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT

Decisions / Signed Resolutions September 11, 1914 JOHNSON, J.:


JOHNSON, J.:


FRANCISCO T. RAMOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. JUAN ABRAHAM, JR., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
body {
font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size:80%;
background-color:#FFFFFF;
margin:0 2% 0 2%;
text-align: justify;
}
h1 {
font-family:times;
}
h2 {
background-color:#cccccc;
padding:10px 0 10px 0;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
}
h3 {
font-weight: bold;
text-transform: uppercase;
text-align: center;
}
div#footer
{
font-size:9px;
}The present action was commenced in the Court of First Instance of the
Province of Cebu, on the 29th of April,1912. Its purpose was to recover of the
defendant the sum of P15,000.00, with interest and costs, being the balance of
an amount due from the defendant to the plaintiff, for a certain amount of sugar
which had been delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, between the 1st of
January, 1912, and the 31st of March, 1912.

The defendant answered, denying generally all of the facts contained in the
petition and also setting up several special defenses and a counterclaim against
the plaintiff.

After hearing the evidence adduced during the trial of the cause, the
Honorable Higinio Benitez, in a carefully prepared opinion in which the facts
are set out in detail,
reached the conclusion that the defendant was indebted
to the plaintiff in the sum of P5,861.20, with legal interest, from the 29th day
of April, 1912, the date on which the present action was commenced. From that
decision, the defendant appealed to this court and made a number of assignments
of error, each of which present questions of fact only. Upon the questions of
fact presented, we have made a careful examination of the record and, while
there is some contradiction found in the testimony of the plaintiff and the
defendant, we have reached the conclusion that the preponderance of the evidence
clearly sustains the conclusions of the lower court. Its judgment is, therefore,
hereby affirmed with costs.

It is so ordered.

After the expiration of 20 days from the date hereof let judgment be entered
in accordance herewith, and 10 days thereafter let the record be returned to the
court from whence it came, for execution.