G.R. No. 6008. March 23, 1911
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. FAUSTINA ORTIZ AND NUMERIANO REGALADO, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
MAPA, J.:
Interpreting this provision, we said in the decision rendered on November 9, 1909, in the case of the U. S. vs. Narvas (14 Phil. Rep., 410), that:
“* * * in order to give the court jurisdiction over the person of the defendant and the subject-matter of the action it is necessary in these cases (those of adulterio, estupro or injuria, mentioned in the said section), that the complaint * * * be made and executed in writing by the offended party personally, if that person be competent to do so, and, if not, then by one of the persons named in the section (referred to) in the order in which they are named therein.”
The complaint, of course, is understood to be such as is defined by section 4 of General Orders, No. 58.
Owing to the absence, then, of a proper complaint by the offended party, the judgment appealed from is reversed and the case dismissed, with the costs of both instances de oficio. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J., Carson and Moreland, JJ., concur.
Trent, J,, concurs in the result.