G.R. No. 47005. January 31, 1940
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LAZARO MAÑAGO, PETITIONER AND APPELLANT.
MORAN, J.:
We hold that the petition was rightly denied. In a criminal proceeding against an accused, the judgment that the law authorizes to be rendered, is either on of the aquittal or of conviction with indemnity and the accessory penalties provided for by law. The payment of salary of an employee during the period of his suspension cannot, as a general rule, be properky decreed by the trial court in a judgment of aquittal. It devolves upon the head of the department concerned and is discretionary with him.
(Sec. 260, Rev. Adm. Code.)
Besides, the petition was filed after the lapse of two years from the rendition of the judgment. The effect of the petition, if granted, would be to modify a final judgment by adding thereto a relief which was not originally contemplated therein. That such cannot be done is the law and the settled rule of this Court.
The appealed order is affirmed, with costs against petitioner.
Avanceña, C.J., Villa-Real, Imperial, Diaz, and Laurel, JJ., cocnur.
Order affirmed.