batas.org

Home
Programs
Courses
Library
App

Log in Get started

Law Library ›Decisions / Signed Resolutions

G. R. No. 42546. January 03, 1936

NISCE VS. MILO AND MENDOZA

Decisions / Signed Resolutions January 3, 1936

Download PDF

🎧 Case Brief Lecture

Get an audio case-brief lecture for this decision — facts, issues, ruling and doctrine, with read-along and presentation mode.

View the case brief →

🎧 Listen to this document

Members can play the full text as audio, free — like a podcast, with read-along highlighting.

Log in free to listen

Land; recovery of title and possession. Judgement against plaintiff affirmed.

‹ Previous HERNANDEZ ET AL. VS. ALCARAZ ET AL. Next › PEOPLE VS. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK ET AL.

More in Decisions / Signed Resolutions

NIÑO RIO GABRILLO, PETITIONER, VS. TRI-J MARKETING, INC, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
DEMETRIA CACHO, REPRESENTED BY DEMETRIA CONFESSOR VIDAL, AND AZIMUTH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
PALM AVENUE HOLDING CO., INC. AND PALM AVENUE REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
KAPATIRAN PARTY (ALLIANCE FOR THE COMMON GOOD), EDILBERTO M. CUENCA AND NORMAN V. CABRERA, PETITIONERS, VS. CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES (19TH CONGRESS), CONSISTING OF THE SENATE… August 26, 2026
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. WWW, XXX, YYY, VVV AND ZZZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. August 19, 2026
HEIRS OF KING SI BIAK, NAMELY, ALBERT KING AND ARTHUR KING, PETITIONERS, VS. PANCITERIA LIDO CHINESE CUISINE CO., RESPONDENT. August 12, 2026

batas.org

Philippine Bar Review, with total clarity.

The Science
Bar Review
Courses
Law School
CSE Review
LET Review
Criminology Review
Professional

© 2016–2026 batas.org — Educating Filipino law students since 2016.