batas.org

Home
Programs
Courses
Library
App

Log in Get started

Law Library ›Decisions / Signed Resolutions

G.R. No. 35593. April 05, 1932

RAMOSO VS. CASIMIRO ET AL.

Decisions / Signed Resolutions April 5, 1932

Download PDF

🎧 Case Brief Lecture

Get an audio case-brief lecture for this decision — facts, issues, ruling and doctrine, with read-along and presentation mode.

View the case brief →

🎧 Listen to this document

Members can play the full text as audio, free — like a podcast, with read-along highlighting.

Log in free to listen

Real actions. Registration of title; judgment for plaintiff affirmed.

‹ Previous MINTU AND TANZA TRAFFIC CO., INC. VS. TOLEDO TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. Next › MINTU ET AL. VS. TOLEDO TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.

More in Decisions / Signed Resolutions

NIÑO RIO GABRILLO, PETITIONER, VS. TRI-J MARKETING, INC, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
DEMETRIA CACHO, REPRESENTED BY DEMETRIA CONFESSOR VIDAL, AND AZIMUTH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
PALM AVENUE HOLDING CO., INC. AND PALM AVENUE REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. August 26, 2026
KAPATIRAN PARTY (ALLIANCE FOR THE COMMON GOOD), EDILBERTO M. CUENCA AND NORMAN V. CABRERA, PETITIONERS, VS. CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES (19TH CONGRESS), CONSISTING OF THE SENATE… August 26, 2026
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. WWW, XXX, YYY, VVV AND ZZZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. August 19, 2026
HEIRS OF KING SI BIAK, NAMELY, ALBERT KING AND ARTHUR KING, PETITIONERS, VS. PANCITERIA LIDO CHINESE CUISINE CO., RESPONDENT. August 12, 2026

batas.org

Philippine Bar Review, with total clarity.

The Science
Bar Review
Courses
CSE Review
Law School
LET Review
Criminology Review
Professional

© 2016–2026 batas.org — Educating Filipino law students since 2016.