SC CIRCULAR NO. 2-89, February 07, 1989
SC CIRCULAR NO. 2-89, February 07, 1989
| TO : |
COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF TAX APPEALS,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, SHARI’ A DISTRICT COURTS AND SHARI’A CIRCUIT COURTS, ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTION SERVICE, AND ALL MEMBERS OF THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES. |
| SUBJECT: | Guidelines and Rules in the referral to the Court en banc of cases assigned to a Division. |
- The Supreme Court sits either en. bane or in Divisions of
three, five or seven Members (Sec. 4[1], Article VIII, 1987
Constitution). At present the Court has three Divisions of five Members
each. - A decision or resolution of a Division of the Court, when
concurred in by a majority of its Members who actually took part in the
deliberations on the issues in a case and voted thereon, and in no case
without the concurrence of at least three of such Members, is a decision
or resolution of the Supreme Court (Section 4[3], Article VIII, 1987
Constitution). - The Court en banc is not an Appellate Court to which decisions or resolutions of a Division may be appealed.
- At any time after a Division takes cognizance of a case and
before a judgment or resolution therein rendered becomes final and
executory, the Division may refer the case en consulta to the Court en banc
which, after consideration of the reasons of the Division for such
referral, may return the case to the Division or accept the case for
decision or resolution.
4a. Paragraph [f] of the Resolution of this Court of 23 February 1984 in Bar Matter No. 209 [formerly item 6, en banc Resolution dated 29 September 1977], enumerating the cases considered as en banc cases, states:
- A resolution of the Division denying a party’s motion for referral to the Court en banc of any Division ease. shall be. final and not appealable to the Court en banc.
- When a decision or resolution is referred by a Division to the Court en banc,
the latter may. in the absence of sufficiently important reasons,
decline to take cognizance of the same, in which case, the dedsion or
resolution shall be returned to the referring Division. - No motion for reconsideration of the action of the Court en banc declining to take cognizance of a referral by a Division, shall be entertained.
- This Circular shall take effect on March 1, 1989.
“f. Cases assigned to a division including motions for
reconsideration which in the opinion of at least three (3) members merit
the attention of the Court en banc and are acceptable by a majority vote of the actual membership of the Court en banc.”
The Court further Resolved to DIRECT the Clerk of Court to have
this Resolution published in a newspaper of general circulation and
circularized among all lower courts and the Integrated Bar of the
Philippines.
February 7, 1989.
|
(Sgd.) MARCELO B. FERNAN |
|
|
Chief Justice
|