G.R. No. L-30961. January 29, 1975
DBP EMPLOYEES UNION-NATU, PETITIONER VS. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES AND COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, RESPONDENTS.
FERNANDO, J.:
The legal situation has radically changed since this case was submitted for decision. There is a new Labor Code.[5] The Court of Industrial Relations was therein abolished, a National Labor Relations Commission taking its place. What is more, there is no mention of any executive certification of labor disputes to such an agency. Under the circumstances, whatever decision that will be rendered by this Court would be characterized by its rather academic character. A ruling on the merits appears unnecessary and inadvisable. At most, it will be in the nature of an advisory opinion.
WHEREFORE, this petition is dismissed for being moot and academic. No costs.
Makalintal, C.J., Barredo, Fernandez, and Aquino, JJ., concur.
Antonio, J., is on sick leave.
[1] The other respondent is the Development Bank of the Philippines.
[2] Cf. Article VII of the 1935 Constitution.
[3] Republic Act No. 875 (1953).
[4] 3 Willoughby 1487 (1929).
[5] Presidential Decree No. 442 (1974).