CELDRED P. RIVERA, AVELINO DERAIN, JR., ARNEL E. ROSALES, WILLEX T. BOMBEO, ALEXANDER CORPUS AND MARCELINO EBARDO, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, BEST ENG…
Decisions / Signed Resolutions FORMER SEVENTH DIVISION BALTAZAR-PADILLA, J.:
BALTAZAR-PADILLA, J.:
Dissatisfied with OUR Decision of June 3, 2014, petitioners now plead for its reconsideration through a motion.
[1] PCIB vs. Escolin, 67 SCRA 202
A perusal of the said motion glaringly reveals that it merely reiterates the arguments earlier raised which had all been squarely addressed and resolved by this Court.
A motion for reconsideration which does not make out new matter sufficiently persuasive to induce modification of judgment will be denied.[1] A party desiring to have a resolution reconsidered should point out facts or
points which were not considered in the resolution.[2]
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, the subject Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Tijam, (Chairperson), and Reyes-Carpio, JJ., concur.
[1] PCIB vs. Escolin, 67 SCRA 202
[2] De los Angeles vs. Court of Appeals, 60 SCRA 116