THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. KIMMAYONG BALLUGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

After the corresponding trial in the court of first instance of Ifugao,
Mountain Province, Kimmayong Ballugan, age 48, was found guilty of having
murdered Dumangeng Pulpog. Accordingly he was sentenced to imprisoned not less
than 12 years and on day nor more than twenty years, with accessories, to
indemnify the heirs of the deceased in the sum of P12,000.00 and to pay
costs.

He took the matter to the Court of Appeals, But said court, believing from
the testimonial and documentary evidence that he was guilty as charged of
murder, and that he should be given life Imprisonment, forwarded the record to
this Court for proper disposition under the law.

There is no question that Dumangeng Pulpog, male, resident of sitio Binalew,
barrio Cababuyan, Municipal district of Banawe, died in the night of January 20,
1952 as a result of several incised wounds violently inflicted while he was on
the way to his residence from a visit to his daughter living in sitio Pagayapi
same barrio. Said daughter Guimaway Dumangeng was following him on that
occasion, and she declared, in open court, substantially as follows:

When at dusk we reached sitio Kotowol I saw Balitog Dumangeng and the accused
Kimmayong coming from Banawe in our direction,, Then they separated, Kimmayong
going toward his home. My father (Pulpog) who walked ahead of me along the
trail, met Balitog Dumangeng (to be called Balitog to avoid confusion) , and the
latter suddenly hurled his spear, missing the mark, because my father stopped
aside in time. Then in swift retaliation my father thrust his spear at Balitog,
hitting him in the abdomen. Instantly the two grappled together. They rolled
down to a lower elevation where the straggle continued. Balitog having got the
worst, (his intestines were coming out) called for help, yelling “where are you
Kimmayong, I am hit by the spear of Dumangeng” (Pulpog). My father left his
antagonist, and climb back to the trail. Suddenly Kimmayong arrived and saying,
“wait for me and we shall fight”, chased my father bolo in hand, and having
overtaken him, slashed him on the shoulder and on the head. I ran away,
thoroughly scared, returned to my house and closed the door for fear that my
neighbors who are relatives of Kimmayong might do me harm. Early the next day I
reported my father’s death to my uncle Dulnuan Dinamling, and to the Mayor of
Banawe before whom I charged Kimmayong with my father’s demise.

Ugnayon Dapdapol, 36, policeman of Banawe gave corroborative testimony to the
effect that a telephone report was received at the municipal building that
Pulpog had killed’ Balitog, so the policemen went to arrest Pulpog, but found
him dead under his own house. His widow informed them her husband had been
killed by Kimmayong. (33 s. n.)

Other evidence proved that the police and the constabulary then went to the
house of Kimmayong to arrest him. He was not there, but his wife was, She gave
them permission to search the house. Examining a palay stack in the house they
discovered safely hidden therein a scabbard and the bolo Exh. B which was
stained with blood, which must have been recent because it smelled like fish.
The wife admitted that it was her husband’s bolo. Dapdapol also positively
identified it was Kimmayong’s bolo, because he saw it once in the latter’s
possession.

The defendant denied having fought with or wounded Pulpog, whose death,
according to him, was due to wounds inflicted by Balitog when Balitog was
attacked by Pulpog with the assistance of Tolac Dakkawe, Dulnuan Dinamling, and
Natocla Dinamling on that same occasion.

His version, in short, is that that night he heard Balitog shouting “Where
are you Kimmayong, because I am speared by Dumangeng (Pulpog) and some
companions”; that he called for their neighbors, Dapolon Lupai, Bantian
Dinamling and Ballugan Kindipan; that they all went to render help to Balitog,
and found him lying on the ground, mortally wounded; that explaining his wounds
Balitog said:

“When I was following the path I was speared on the side of my abdomen and I
saw it was Dumangeng. I was speared again on the other side of my abdomen and I
turned my head and I saw it was Tolac Dakkawe who speared me. I was again
speared on the back and when I turned around I saw Dulnuan Dinamling and Natocla
Dinamling who speared me from behind, x x x Seeing that my enemies were many I
saw Dumangeng whom I grabbed and we rolled down together until we came to a
level spot. Upon reaching that level spot we both stood up, then I drew my bolo
and gave him a blow on the neck. I gave him a second blow on his head and when
he was trying to ran away I gave him again a blow at his back”

The trial judge, Hon. Jose R, de Venecia and the Court of Appeals rejected
defendant’s story because it was highly improbable that with the mortal wounds
inflicted on Balitog by Pulpog (and companions, according to defense) said
Balitog could still have sufficient strength and courage to inflict five serious
wounds on Pulpog. According to a defense witness, Balitog said (p. 98) “when
Dumangen Pulpog was trying to go away I continued to follow him and gave (him)
another blow on the back”. With intestines out, Balitog could net possibly do
that, We agree that the story is inherently implausible^[1]. Besides, it does not tally with the
undeniable fact that when the police were notified the next day of the death of
Balitog, Pulpog alone was mentioned as the killer. (See pages 134, 136 and 148
s.n.)

And so far as the record shows, no action has even been filed against
Pulpog’s companions for Balitog’s death. Furthermore, if the events developed as
defendant narrated, why did his party hide the bolo, supposing it was Balitog’s?
Anyone, even a non-Christian, knows that Balitog was not to blame under the
circumstances.

Finally it appears from defendant’s story that before going to
help Balitog, Kimmayong and companions prepared a stretcher and brought it with
them. This shows they knew, or Kimmayong knew, that Balitog was already dying or
mortally wounded, could not walk and would have to be carried. Which suggests
that what really happened was this: after retaliating for Balitog and downing
Pulpog, (as told by the People’s witness) Kimmayong looked for companions to
help him carry Balitog home. They made the stretcher, and carried Balitog home.
Such central fact, was subsequently embroidered and tailored to fit defendant’s
story, which would paint Balitog as a native superman, even as it frees
Kimmayong from criminal responsibility.

We entertain no reasonable doubt that to avenge the defeat of Balitog, his
companion, Kimmayong pursued Pulpog and hacked him to death. However, we do not
believe there was treachery, the assault not being sudden, because he warned
Pulpog of his purpose, shouting, “wait for me and we will fight”, and the latter
having had a chance to prepare for the attack^[2].

The crime was homicide punishable with reclusion temporal. (Art. 249 Revised
Penal Code.) The medium period (applicable in the absence of modifying
circumstances) is 14 years 8 months and 1 day to 17 years and 4 months.

Wherefore, in view of the Indeterminate Sentence Law, this appellant should
be, and is hereby sentenced to be in prison not less than 8 years nor more than
17 years, plus accessories, and to pay P2,000 indemnity and the costs. The
appealed judgment is modified accordingly. So ordered.

Reyes, Jugo, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, and Reyes,
J.B.L., JJ., concur.

Padilla, J., took no part.

---

^[1] Supposing that testimony as to what
Balitog said is admissible as part of res gestae. Surely it was
not a dying declaration.

^[2] People v. Cañete 44 Phil. 478; People
v. Luna 76 Phil. 101; People v. Visagar L-3384, June 12,
1953.