G.R. No. L-1674. May 09, 1949

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. PABLO SOMERA & FAUSTINO BARNACHEA, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

Decisions / Signed Resolutions May 9, 1949 PARAS, J.:


PARAS, J.:


This is an, appeal from a judgment of the Court of First
Instance of Ilocos Sur finding the appellants, Pablo Somera and Faustino
Barnachea, guilty of murder and sentencing them to reclusion perpetua, to
indemnify jointly and severally the heirs of Felix Somera in the sum of P2,000,
and to pay the costs.

In the evening of March 11, 1945, Felix Somera, his children
Moises and Redempta, and his houseboy Luis Somera, while proceeding towards
their evacuation place in the barrio of Rucab, mimicipality of Tagudin, Ilocos
Sur, were overtaken by the appellants who wore both riding on a horse. Pablo
Somera thereupon shouted at the group of Felix Somera, “* * * of your mother,
puñeta get out of our way,” to which Felix meekly replied, “Please, Pablo
speak in a nicer way.” After Pablo had in turn remarked, “Oh! so, you are the
one,” the two appellants, who had alighted from their horse, began to attack
Felix, Faustino Barnachea locking his arms around Felix, and Pablo repeatedly
striking Felix with a stone, as a result of which Felix fell to the ground
unconscious. Moises Somera attempted to help his father, but he was prevented by
Pablo who hit him with a bolo. Moises accordingly had to leave, seeking police
help and medical attention for the bolo wound on his hand which he received from
Pablo. The appellants also left. After being revived, Felix Somera, with the aid
of his two children, managed to ride on his horse; and the trio proceeded on
their way to the poblacion. They had not covered a long distance,
however, when the children noticed the return of the appellants. Coming from
behind, and each taking one side, the appellants suddenly boloed and pulled
Felix Somera from his horse, the attack being continued even after Felix fell.
The latter was thereupon dragged to the bushes where Felix, then held by
Faustino Barnachea, was given a bolo thrust by Pablo Somera, whereupon the two
appellants left. These facts have been proved by the testimony of Redempta,
Moises and Luis Somera. An examination of the dead body by the Sanitary
Inspector revealed that Felix received no less than nineteen wounds, three of
which were fatal.

Pablo Somera admits that he alone had killed Felix Somera, but
he claims that he did it in self-defense, his version being as follow: Felix
Somera threw a stone which hit and caused appellants’ horse to cavort; after the
appellants fell, Felix held and boxed Pablo Somera; Faustino Barnachea was able
to pull Felix and thereby to release Pablo; although the latter tried to flee,
Felix grabbed his shirt, choked him again and, after saying, “I am going to kill
you,” swang his bolo at Pablo; avoiding the blow, Pablo returned the attack by
boloing Felix on the temple and the hands and thereafter giving many more blows.
Consistently with Pablo Somera’s theory, Faustino Barnachea maintains that he
had no criminal participation in the fight between Felix and Pablo as he
withdrew after seeing the shining boloes of the combatants.

The record fails to show that the principal witnesses for the
prosecution had any special reason for imputing falsely to the appellants the
crime of murder. They are two young boys and a young girl who were with Felix
Somera on the occasion in question, although Moises Somera saw the occurrence
only until that point when he had to leave to seek police and medical help. They
had narrated the main features of the appellants’ attack with such persuasive
effect as to leave no room in our mind for any reasonable doubt as to
appellants’ guilt.

It is hardly believable that Felix Somera, an old man of
sixty-five, would have started a fight against two men of much younger age, one
of whom was admittedly armed. The theory of self-defense on the part of Pablo is
clearly negatived by the numerous (19) wounds inflicted upon Felix. Upon the
other hand, such wounds are indicative of aggression and of the participation
therein of appellant Faustino Barnachea, as plainly testified to by the
witnesses for the prosecution, especially when account is taken of the obvious
fact that neither Pablo Somera nor Faustino Barnachea received any injury.

The guilty connection of Faustino Barnachea is further
demonstrated by the circumstance that he surrendered with Pablo Somera. It is
highly incredible that the former, if he had nothing to do with the crime, would
have allowed himself to be thus dragged into the case merely upon invitation or
insistence of Pablo.

We have no doubt that, judging by the way in which they carried
out the fatal assault, the two appellants acted from and cooperated in a common
criminal design, and treachery has elevated the killing to the category of
murder. The appellants came from behind, covered the two sides of Felix Somera,
and suddenly attacked him with bolo blows, at a time when Felix was undoubtedly
still too weak to offer any defense. It should be repeated that Felix, after the
initial assault by the appellants, was able to mount his horse only after being
helped by his young companions. There was also present in the commission of the
offense the aggravating circumstance of insult or disregard of the respect due
the offended party on account of his age, but this, is offset by the mitigating
circumstance of voluntary surrender.

The appealed judgment, being in conformity with the facts and
the law, is affirmed with costs. So ordered.

Moran, C. J., Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Tuason, Montemayor,
and Reyes, JJ., concur.

PERFECTO, J.:

Except that we believe that the indemnity should be increased
to P6,000, in accordance with the decision in People vs. Amansec, L-927, we
concur in the above decision.