A.M. No. 98-10-141-MTCC. November 18, 1998
RE: HOLD DEPARTURE ORDER DATED APRIL 13, 1998 ISSUED BY JUDGE JUAN C. NARTATEZ, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 3, DAVAO CITY.
MENDOZA, J.:
Required to comment,[1] Judge Nartatez states that:
[He is] admitting that [he] issued the hold-departure order referred to in the letter of Ma. Daphne Dancel.
With deep regrets, [he] erroneously issued the order, unaware of the existence of Supreme Court Circular No. 39-97 dated June 19, 1997.
To rectify the error, [he] has issued his Order dated August 4, 1998 setting aside and/or recalling the hold-departure order, copy of which is enclosed.
Based on these facts, the Court Administrator recommends that Judge Nartatez be reprimanded and reminded that “he should keep himself abreast of Supreme Court issuances so as not to commit the same mistake in the future.”
The Court finds this recommendation well taken. The Code of Judicial Conduct enjoins judges to be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence.[2] They can live up to this expectation only by diligent effort to keep themselves abreast of the legal and jurisprudential developments. The learning process in law is a never ending and ceaseless process.[3]
WHEREFORE, Judge Juan C. Nartatez is hereby REPRIMANDED with WARNING that repetition of the same or similar acts will be dealt with more severely.
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J., Davide Jr., Romero, Bellosillo, Melo, Puno, Vitug, Kapunan, Panganiban, Quisumbing, Purisima and Pardo, JJ., concur.
Martinez, J., on official leave.
[1] Rollo, p. 2.
[2] Canon 3, Rule 3.01.
[3] See Re: Inhibition of Judge Bienvenido R. Estrada, Regional Trial Court, Branch 57, San Carlos City, Pangasinan in Civil Case No. SCC-1822, A.M. No. 98-1-32-RTC, July 29, 1998.