G.R. No. L-40185. May 31, 1977

TING PING LAY, PETITIONER, VS. HON. JOSE C. COLAYCO, AS JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MANILA, BRANCH XXI, AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.

Decisions / Signed Resolutions May 31, 1977 SECOND DIVISION ANTONIO, J.:
Download PDF


ANTONIO, J.:


Petition for Mandamus to compel respondent Judge to allow
Petitioner’s Record on Appeal in Naturalization Case No. 81703 of the Court of
First Instance of Manila, entitled “In the Matter of the Petition of Ting
Ping Lay to be Admitted a Citizen of the Philippines.”

It appears that Petitioner Ting Ping Lay obtained a favorable
decision in the afore-mentioned case on September 29, 1971, but after the lapse
of the two-year period required by law before the judgment could be executed
and registered and petitioner could take his oath, respondent Judge issued an
adverse Order dated April 22, 1974, denying the petition and setting aside the
Decision of September 29, 1971.

A motion for reconsideration of the foregoing Order was denied
and petitioner sought to appeal the Order of denial to this Court, filing for
the purpose a Notice of Appeal, a Record on Appeal and an Appeal Bond, but said
appeal was dismissed by respondent Judge, per Order dated August 16, 1974, on
the ground that the same had not been perfected on time.  A “Motion for Reconsideration and/or
Petition for Relief from Order of August
16, 1974” was denied for lack of
merit.  Hence, the
instant petition.

On May 10, 1977,
during the pendency of these proceedings, petitioner,
thru counsel, filed a “Motion to Declare Naturalization Proceedings Moot
and Academic” on the ground that on May
4, 1976, Petitioner Ting Ping Lay was granted Philippine
citizenship by naturalization pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 923 and in
accordance with the procedure prescribed by Letter of Instructions No.
270.  It appears that on May 6, 1976, the grant of
naturalization became effective by means of petitioner’s having taken his Oath
of Allegiance and the issuance to him of Certificate of Naturalization No.
2036000 (Annex “A”).

In view of the circumstances obtaining in this case, We find the foregoing motion to declare the proceedings moot
and academic to be well taken.

WHEREFORE, the naturalization proceedings subject matter
of the instant petition, as well as all incidents thereof, are
hereby declared moot and academic. 
Petition dismissed.

Fernando, (Chairman), Barredo, Aquino, and Martin, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, Jr., J., on leave.