URSULA FERMIN, PETITIONER, V. SPS. EUFROCINA PADILLA AND ARIEL CALUSAGIN, EDGAR PADERES AND MYRNA PADERES, RESPONDENTS.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions FORMER NINTH DIVISION REYES, JR., J.C., J.:
REYES, JR., J.C., J.:
For resolution is the Motion for Reconsideration (Rollo, pp. 327-331) filed by petitioner praying for the reconsideration of the November 22, 2013 Decision (Rollo, pp. 321-326) of this Court. After carefully considering the grounds raised in the subject motion, We find that the reasons and the arguments in support thereof have been amply treated, discussed and passed upon in the subject decision. The additional arguments proffered therein constitute no cogent or compelling reason to modify, much less reverse, it.
WHEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED for lack of merit.
SO ORDERED.
Lopez and Inting, JJ., concur.