GIL D. CAMACHO, PETITIONER, VS. THE HONORABLE LEILA M. DE LIMA, IN HER CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI-…
PAREDES, J.:
Comment[3] was filed by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) on December 2, 2013, while petitioner’s reply[4] was filed on February 12, 2014.
On October 22, 2014, the parties were directed[5] to file their respective memorandum.
On November 10, 2014, petitioner’s application for the issuance of a TRO and/or WPI was denied[6].
On December 17, 2014, the OSG filed its memorandum[7], while petitioner asked for several extensions[8] to file his memorandum, the last of which was filed on January 13, 2015.
On January 27, 2015, petitioner filed a motion to withdraw petition9 stating that there exists no compelling reason to maintain the instant petition; and that petitioner has opted to pursue his cause in Criminal Case No. R-PSY-13-07286-CR, before the Regional Trial Court, Pasay City. Petitioner prays that the petition be withdrawn sin perjucio.
WHEREFORE, petitioner’s motion to withdraw petition is GRANTED. The petition is DISMISSED at the instance of the petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
Dicdican, I. P., Chairperson, and Ybañez, E. A., JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp. 42-52.
[2] Rollo, pp. 53-60.
[3] Rollo, pp. 285-352.
[4] Rollo, pp. 751-75.
[5] See Resolution dated October 22, 2014. rollo, p. 777.
[6] See Resolution dated November 10, 2014, rollo, pp. 780-4.
[7] Rollo, pp. 797-867.
[8] See Motion for Additional Time (to file Memorandum) filed on December 19, 2014, rollo, pp. 873-5; Urgent Motion for Extension of Time filed on January 7, 2015, rollo, pp. 876-8; and Urgent Motion for Extension of Time filed on January 13, 2015, rollo, pp. 879-82.
[9] Rollo, pp. 883-7.