CABLE ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. FIRST CLASS CELLPHONE EXCHANGE, INC., LIEZL E. TOLENTINO, LEE M. CASTRO, GERALDINE G. ESTAQUIAO, LESLIE P. SANCHEZ AND A…
DE GUIA-SALVADOR, R., J.:
dated February 28, 2014, the Court required plaintiff-appellant to
submit proof of actual receipt by the other appellees of their
respective copies of the Appellant’s Brief for the purpose of computing
the period for the latter to file their respective Briefs.
Per the Court’s CMIS verification,[2]
as of June 4, 2014, no compliance with the foregoing Resolution had yet
been filed by appellant despite its receipt of a copy thereof on March
17, 2014.[3]
WHEREFORE, for plaintiff-appellant’s failure to comply with the Court’s February 28, 2014 Resolution, the instant appeal is DISMISSED.
The following matters are NOTED:
(1) The return of the copies of the Court’s February 28, 2014
and March 25, 2014 Resolutions that were sent to defendants-appellees
with postal notations “RTS-Moved Out” and “RTS-Unknown”;[4] and
(2) The Brief filed on May 14, 2014 by defendant-appellee Arlene F. Montoya.[5]
SO ORDERED.
Garcia and Bueser, JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, p. 54.
[2] Ibid., p. 54-back side.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid., pp. 60-69, 108.
[5] Ibid., pp. 79-98.