IN RE: PETITION FOR RE-ISSUANCE OF NEW OWNER’S DUPLICATE COPY OF TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 586, REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF GUILLERMO ARCANGEL.
SORONGON, E.D., J.
“COMPROMISE AGREEMENT
The Parties, assisted by their respective counsels, to this Honorable Court most respectfully submit this Compromise Agreement and aver as follows:
1. The parties agree to finally settle this matter amicably;
2. The Petitioners shall sell the land subject matter of this case to the Oppositor for the amount of Thirteen Million Three Hundred Nine Thousand Pesos (Php13,309,000.00) NET OF ALL TAXES, FEES AND EXPENSES necessary to transfer title in the name of the latter;
3. Upon signing of this Compromise Agreement, the Oppositor shall tender the amount of Five Million Pesos (Php5,000,000.00) to the Petitioners through their herein attorney-in-fact, Henry Arcangel, who in turn will surrender the possession of the land subject matter of this case to the Oppositor, free from any occupants;
4. Upon signing of this Compromise Agreement, the opposition of the Oppositor to the issuance of a new owner’s copy of TCT No. 586 is deemed withdrawn. For which reason, the court a quo shall order the issuance of the said new owner’s copy, which order shall be immediately executory;
5. The parties agree that the court shall order the Register of Deeds of Naga City to release the new owner’s copy to the Oppositor METROLAND PROPERTIES AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION;
6. The remaining balance of Eight Million Three Hundred Nine Thousand Pesos (Php8,309,000.00) shall be paid in eighteen (18) equal monthly installments beginning one month after execution hereof;
7. The Oppositor shall withhold the release of the last ten (10) installments if the title has not been submitted to the Register of Deeds ready to be transferred in the name of the Oppositor, unless the fault or delay is on the part of the Oppositor in which case the remaining amount shall become immediately due;
8. The last 10 installments shall be released in full within 2 days from the tender of the title and tax declaration in the name of the oppositor;
9. The oppositor is deemed the owner of the property upon issuance of Certificate of Transfer of Possession by the Petitioners and upon its actual possession, which fact shall be recorded in the Barangay Blotter Book of Barangay Cararayan, Naga City;
10. The parties may agree to an entirely new agreement if the situation so warrants to facilitate the transfer of the title in the name of the Oppositor;
11. Any of the parties may ask for the issuance of a writ of execution to enforce any and all the terms of the compromise agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties assisted by their respective counsels have signed this Compromise Agreement and request the Honorable Court to approve the same as a final adjudication of their respective rights and claims in this case.
4 January 2014. Naga City, Philippines.
THE HEIRS OF GUILLERMO AND ENCARNACION ARCANGEL METROLAND PROPERTIES AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Represented by: (SGD.)HENRY ARCANGEL
Attorney-in-fact
Per Joint Special Power of
Attorney dated March 1, 2013 (SGD.) MA. GUADALUPE S. ESPINAS
Authorized Representative
Per Secretary’s Certificate
dated June 27, 2013 (SGD.) MARION ELOISA ESCUETA-LEGACION
Counsel for Petitioners
Attorney’s Roll No. 41548/May 7, 1997
IBP OR No. 903075/Camarines Sur/December 21, 2012
PTR OR No. 103939 X /Naga City/January 3, 2013
MCLE Compliance No. IV-0007822; Sept. 12, 2012
Lot 22, Block 12, Jardin Real de Naga Subd.
Concepcion Grande, 4400 Naga City (SGD.)FELIPE V. BERCES
BERCES & CABREDO LAW OFFICE
Counsel for Intervenor/Oppositor
Attorney’s Roll No. 33830/November 3, 1986
IBP No. 839005/January 10, 2013
PTR No. 8044340/ Albay/ January 6, 2013
MCLE Compliance No. III-0018309; Aug. 4, 2010
Bicol Medical Plaza, Rizal St.
Legazpi City”
WHEREFORE, consistent with the policy of this Court to encourage amicable settlement/resolution of disputes among party litigants and to approve as well compromise agreement not contrary to law and public order, policy, morals and good customs, we resolve to render judgment on the basis of the said Compromise Agreement. Accordingly, parties are enjoined to faithfully comply with the terms and conditions therein setforth.
Further, this case is declared CLOSED and TERMINATED.
SO ORDERED.
Carandang (Chairperson) and Gonzales-Sison, JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp. 23-25.
[2] Joint Special Power of Attorney dated March 01, 2013 and Secretary’s Certificate dated July 27, 2013, Rollo, pp. 38 and 46, respectively.