ADM. CASE No. 783-MJ. October 08, 1974
JUAN DE LA CRUZ, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE GLICERIO ARENAL, MUNICIPAL JUDGE OF QUEZON, QUEZON, RESPONDENT.
FERNANDEZ, J.:
On September 28, 1973,[4] Assistant Executive Secretary Ronaldo B. Zamora sent the following letter to the Honorable Secretary of Justice:
The Honorable
The Secretary of Justice
Manila
S i r:
Pursuant to your recommendation, I wish to inform you that the President accepts the resignation of Atty. Glicerio Arenal as Municipal Judge of Quezon, Quezon, effective immediately.
|
Very truly yours,
s/t/RONALDO B. ZAMORA Assistant Executive Secretary” |
Then on October 11, 1973, the Secretary of Justice sent the following telegram to the respondent:
“OCTOBER 11, 1973MUNICIPAL JUDGE GLICERIO ARENAL
QUEZON, QUEZONYOU ARE ADVISED PRESIDENT ACCEPTED YOUR RESIGNATION EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY PLEASE VACATE YOUR POSITION UPON RECEIPT HEREOF LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE FOLLOWS
SECRETARY ABAD SANTOS”
Considering that the instant complaint, not being verified, does not comply with the requirements of Sec. 1, Rule 140 of the Rules of Court, and/or Sec. 32, Article VII of Republic Act No. 2260, as amended, and, considering further, that this Court has, in several administrative cases, ruled that the complaint should be dismissed, being moot and academic, it appearing that the resignation of the respondent Municipal Judge has been accepted by the President (Resolution dated August 15, 1973, in Adm. Case No. 259 [MJ]) – (Gaudiano Calagan vs. [MJ] Rosendo Gabriel); Resolution dated August 20, 1973, in Adm. Case No. 62 [MJ] – (Jose Viado, et al., vs. MJ Teofilo N. Tumulak), the instant administrative complaint against Ex-Municipal Judge Glicerio Arenal is hereby DISMISSED and considered terminated.
SO ORDERED.
Fernando, (Chairman), Barredo, Antonio and Aquino, JJ., concur.
[1] pp. 51-52, Rollo.
[2] p. 53, ibid.
[3] pp. 55-58, ibid.
[4] pp. 80-83, ibid.