GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF RANDOM DRUG TESTING FOR STUDENTS OF SECONDARY, TERTIARY, VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL SCHOOLS, AMENDING BOARD REGULATION NO. 6, SERIES OF 2003

WHEREAS, Section 36 (c), Article III of Republic Act 9165, mandates
that the students of secondary and tertiary schools shall undergo drug
testing and that all drug testing expenses whether in public or private
schools under this Section will be borne by the government;

WHEREAS, government already implemented a similar random drug testing
activity in 2005 for secondary level students, and in 2007, for
tertiary level students;

WHEREAS, there is a need to amend provisions of the implementing
guidelines in order to adopt new policy directives and remedy perceived
ambiguities in the previous issuance;

WHEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, as it is hereby RESOLVED, to amend Board
Regulation No. 6, series of 2003 specifically the following provisions
thereof:

SECTION 1. Subject, is hereby amended by
including “students of vocational and technical schools”, as among those
covered by the guidelines which should now read as follows:

Subject: “GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF RANDOM
DRUG TESTING FOR STUDENTS OF SECONDARY, TERTIARY, VOCATIONAL AND
TECHNICAL SCHOOLS”

SECTION 2. Letter A “Guiding Principles in
the implementation of Random Drug Testing in Schools and Management
of Drug Test Results” is hereby amended by adding another paragraph as
paragraph number 12.

12. Random drug testing for students is
considered by the government as entirely a “health” issue and aims to
provide appropriate interventions, to those who will be tested positive
for dangerous drug use, which will help the student stop further use
and/or abuse of the substance.

SECTION 3. Letter C “DEFINITION OF TERMS”
is hereby amended to include the terms “CHAIN OF CUSTODY, INTERVENTIONS
and LABORATORY, which shall be defined as follows:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY – refers to procedures
to account for each specimen by tracking its handling and storage from
point of collection to final disposal. These procedures require that the
applicant’s identity is confirmed and that a Custody and Control Form
is used from time of collection to receipt by the laboratory. Within
the laboratory, appropriate chain of custody records must account for
the samples until disposal.

INTERVENTIONS – are therapeutic programs appropriate for
high-risk individuals/students who are using dangerous drugs and who
need special assistance to recognize the signs and symptoms of initial
drug use and dependency. It may include corrective or rehabilitative
actions that may take the form of crisis intervention, peer counseling,
peer leadership programs, parent/peer groups, or psychological
counseling at the individual or family level and structured
rehabilitation programs. It may also include medical intervention of
the afflicted student whenever necessary.

LABORATORY – refers to a DOH-Accredited
private or government facility that is capable of testing a specimen to
determine the presence of dangerous drugs therein.

SECTION 4. Letter D “PROCEDURES IN THE CONDUCT OF RANDOM DRUG TESTING” is hereby amended such that:

Item 2.a should read as: “The Supervising Agency shall
inform all schools on their inclusion in the random drug testing
program.”

Item 4. On Treatment of Random Drug Test Results is hereby amended in its entirety such that it shall read as follows:

4. TREATMENT OF RANDOM DRUG TEST RESULTS

a. The results of the test shall be strictly confidential. No school shall publish or post results whether positive or negative.

b. Any person who violates the rules of confidentiality
of the results and selection shall be liable under Section 72 of RA
9165 and such other appropriate laws.

c. In case the test results are positive at the
screening level, the same specimen shall immediately be submitted for
confirmation observing all strict chain of custody procedures and
confidentiality of records.

d. If a student is “confirmed” to be using a dangerous drug, the following shall be observed:

i. The Laboratory, places results in a sealed envelop for transmission to the Central Office of the Supervising Agency

ii. The Supervising Agency shall
then transmit the results to the concerned school/institution by
informing the particular school/institution’s random drug testing
(RDT) Coordinator previously assigned by the selection board.

1. The Supervising Agency shall remind the RDT Coordinator of the confidential nature of the results and strict handling of the “chain of custody” of the information should be observed.

iii. The school/institution’s RDT Coordinator shall
then inform the parent and the student of the results and how the
information is regarded with utmost secrecy and confidentiality.

1. The Coordinator shall remind the student that divulging the results with anybody will be at his own risk; and

2. That if possible, the information should remain in the confines of their house.

iv. The parent, the RDT Coordinator and the student
shall then prepare for a case conference to discuss issues of drug use
and possible dependency.

v. The Drug Testing Coordinator
shall refer the student and his/her parent to a government-owned
DOH-accredited facility or DOH-accredited government physician to determine the student’s dependency level.

vi. A date and venue shall be selected for the case conference

1. Date should be agreeable to all
concerned in the case conference (Parent, Student, RDT Coordinator and
the DOH Accredited Physician).

2. Venue should have a semblance of privacy (preferably in a room, with an office table where group discussions and individual sessions can be done).

3. Whichever is more convenient for the student and parent, venue could be as follows:

a. Regional Office or hospital of the DOH

b. Regional Office of the Supervising Agency

c. Other designated venue which can assure privacy

vii. The RDT Coordinator shall inform Supervising
Agency Central Office coordinator on the possible dates and venue for
further discussions of options.

viii. Once, finalized, the group shall proceed as planned with the case conference.

1. Drug dependency level of the student shall be evaluated;

2. Cross reference of information shall be validated from the parent and RDT Coordinator;

3. Treatment planning for the student shall be discussed and presented to the student and parent;

4. Options for treatment should be presented to the parent and student;

5. If a student (below 18 years of age) is found to be a
drug dependent, the school authority shall refer him/her to the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) or a local social
worker for counseling and other intervention;

6. The parent and the student may choose to enroll the
student in a private rehabilitation center or program or opt to avail of
the rehabilitation services of the government through a DOH-accredited
facility.

a. If child opts for government service, the DOH treatment and rehabilitation centers nearest to the area can provide services;

b. If the parent and student would
opt for private services, appropriate referrals will be done, taking
note of the progress of treatment on a regular basis;

7. Trained guidance counselors can also be utilized.

e. If a student is “confirmed” negative from dangerous drug use, the following shall be observed;

1. Names per school/institution of all who tested negative will be summarized in a result form.

2. The Summarized result form shall be transmitted to the Supervising Agency concerned.

3. Supervising Agency Central Office shall forward the same to the concerned school/institution’s RDT Coordinator.

4. The RDT Coordinator and/or teacher adviser/and/or
guidance counselor shall individually inform each student and parent
concerned regarding the results.

f. Positive confirmatory drug test result under this
Regulation shall not be a ground for expulsion or any disciplinary
action against the student and should not be reflected in any and all
academic records. Under no circumstances shall the results be used to
incriminate any student for further legal action which may result to
administrative/civil/criminal liabilities.

Likewise, consistent with the
requirements of confidentiality, the results of drug tests conducted
pursuant to this Board Regulation, shall not be used as evidence in any
court or tribunal, where the subject student stands to be accused of any
crime or felony, and for any other purpose.

g. The student shall then undergo the prescribed
intervention program under the supervision of the DOH-accredited
facility or physician, or private practitioners, or social worker, in
consultation with the parent. Such process of observation and counseling
shall be done in coordination with the Drug Counselor of the school.

h. If student shows no signs of
improvement, recovery or fails the drug tests the second time, the
DOH-accredited facility or physician, may make a recommendation to the
student, parent, and Drug Testing Coordinator to have the student
referred to a DOH-accredited facility suited to the student’s level of
dependency. If another drug testing is conducted for another period on
the same population , and the student is found positive the second
time, the school shall proceed in accordance with Section 61, RA 9165.

i. If the parents refuse to act, the school shall
proceed in accordance to Sec. 61 of RA 9165 without prejudice to the
provision of Section 73, RA 9165.

SECTION 5. Letter F “TRAINING OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS” is hereby amended such that letter F shall read as follows:

F. TRAINING OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS

The Department of Education (DepEd),
Commission on Higher Education (CHED), Technical Education and Skills
Development Authority (TESDA), the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency
(PDEA) and Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB) in coordination with each other,
shall formulate and conduct the training program for guidance
counselors for the purpose of enhancing their skills in handling drug
abuse prevention programs and handling drug dependency cases. The school
guidance counselors and other qualified medical personnel shall be
encouraged to undergo DOH accreditation.

SECTION 6. Letter H “ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE” is hereby amended to
delete the phrase “impose sanction” and change it with the phrase
“implement interventions” and adding as additional sentence
“Interventions should be consistent with the provisions of this Board
Regulation and its guiding principles of the first paragraph and adding
as third paragraph thereof the phrase; “Supervising Agencies should
encourage institutionalization of Drug Testing Activities in
schools/institutions concerned over-and-above the random drug testing
program conducted by the government. The Supervising Agencies and the
DOH should help build up capacities of schools/institutions to achieve
competencies and self-reliance on random drug testing. Schools who
initiated the conduct of similar drug testing activities shall submit
reports to the Supervising Agencies for proper accreditation of the
Department of Health.” So that letter H of the Guidelines should now
read as follows;

H. ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Students who refuse to undergo random drug testing shall be dealt
with in accordance with the rules and regulations of the schools;
provided that at no time refusal to undergo testing shall not give rise
to a presumption of drug use or dependency; provided further that the
school may implement interventions on such refusal other than the offense of drug use or dependency. Interventions should be consistent with the provisions of this Board Regulation and its guiding principles.

Schools that refuse to implement the random drug testing program
shall be liable under Section 32 of RA 9165 without prejudice to other
administrative sanctions imposed by the Supervising Agencies. The
Supervising Agency shall report the same to the Philippine Drug
Enforcement Agency (PDEA) and the Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB).

Supervising Agencies should encourage
institutionalization of Drug Testing Activities in schools/institutions
concerned over-and-above the random drug testing program conducted by
the government. The Supervising Agencies and the DOH should help build
up capacities of schools/institutions to achieve competencies and
self-reliance on random drug testing. Schools who initiated the conduct
of similar drug testing activities shall submit reports to the
Supervising Agencies for proper accreditation of the Department of Health.

Attached is the flow chart^[*] of activities which shall be an integral part of this Regulation.

All issuances, including Board Regulation No. 6, s. 2003 or part thereof inconsistent herewith, are deemed repealed or modified accordingly.

SECTION 7. Effectivity –
This Regulation shall take effect after fifteen (15) days after its
publication in two (2) newspapers of general circulation and after its
registration with the Office of the National Administrative Register
(ONAR), UP Law Center, Quezon City.

Adopted: 3 June 2009

(SGD.) SEC. VICENTE C. SOTTO III
Chairman, Dangerous Drugs Board

Attested by:

(SGD.) Undersecretary EDGAR C. GALVANTE
Secretary of the Board

 

---

^[*] Text Available at Office of the National Administrative Register, U. P. Law Complex, Diliman, Quezon City