RENAN C. SIKAT, PETITIONER, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, RESPONDENT.
Decisions / Signed Resolutions December 16, 2013 FORMER TENTH DIVISION PERALTA, JR., E. B., J.:
PERALTA, JR., E. B., J.:
Inasmuch as the points aired by petitioner on the Motion for Reconsideration[1] were squarely addressed by Our Decision,[2] further disquisition hereafter on fundamental concepts about petitioner’s participation for the perceived misdeed will amount to an ad infinitum exercise.
[1] Rollo, pp. 852-859.
Accordingly, We hereby DENY petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration for lack of merit.
SO ORDERED.
De Leon, M. M., Chairperson, and Cruz, S. C., JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp. 852-859.
[2] Dated December 16, 2013, Rollo, pp. 840-851.