4 Phil. 78
[ G.R. No. 1626. April 22, 1904 ]
THE UNITED STATES, COMPLAINANT AND APPELLEE, VS. HERMOGENES ONTI, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
MAPA, J.:
The prosecution has not proved that the defendant was aware of the contents of the letter or that he knew in any other way that the purpose of Montalan or of Colonel Cosme in sending the letter to Esteban Kojas was to demand supplies for the support of his band. This being so, it can not be concluded that the accused acted with the knowledge that the object of the letter was this unlawful purpose. Consequently he can not be convicted of the crime defined and punished under section 4 of Act No. 518, of which he is accused, because this provision requires that the defendant act knowingly in order that he may be considered guilty of that crime.
The judgment of the court below is reversed and the defendant acquitted with the costs de oficio.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, McDonough, and Johnson, JJ., concur.
Date created: October 24, 2014
Leave a Reply