7 Phil. 395
[ G.R. No. 3216. January 26, 1907 ]
PASCUALA PRADO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JUAN LAGERA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J.:
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained on the ground that the property of the deceased was in process of administration and liquidation in accordance with the provisions of the present Code of Civil Procedure, and this action, therefore, could not be maintained.
It does not appear from the complaint distinctly whether the property in question is a part of the conjugal property or whether it is a part of the bienes parafernales of the plaintiff, but it makes no difference to which one of these two classes it belongs. We have held in the case of Alfonso vs. Natividad[1] (4 Off. Gaz., 461) that when a conjugal partnership is dissolved by the death of the husband the inventory which is mentioned in article 1418 of the Civil Code should be made and the partnership affairs settled in the Court of First Instance which takes jurisdiction of the settlement of his estate, and in the same proceeding. That this inventory should include the bienes parafernales of the wife and the capital of both spouses appears very plainly from the provisions of articles 1421, 1422, and 1423 of the Civil Code. The affairs of the conjugal partnership being in process of liquidation in another proceeding, this action can not be maintained. The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
After expiration of twenty days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith and ten days thereafter the record remanded to the court below for proper action. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Mapa, Carson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
[1] 6 Phil. Rep., 240.
Date created: May 28, 2014
Leave a Reply