G.R. No. 181043. October 08, 2008 (Case Brief / Digest)

### Title: People of the Philippines v. Millano Muit et al.

### Facts:
The case originated from two separate informations charging Millano Muit y Munoz, Sergio Pancho y Cagumoc, Jr., Rolando Dequillo y Tampos, Romeo Pancho, Eduardo “Eddie” Hermano alias “Bobby Reyes” alias “Eddie Reyes”, and Joseph Ferraer with kidnapping for ransom with homicide and carnapping. Ferraer was later discharged to become a state witness. The incident occurred on November 11, 1997, when Orestes Julaton introduced Sergio Pancho, Sr., and others to Ferraer as relatives needing a safehouse for their “Visitor”. Hermano assured Ferraer of splitting the ransom money. Subsequently, the group received word to proceed with their plan. On December 2, 1997, the victim, along with engineers, visited a construction site where he was abducted and his vehicle was carjacked. Following a police shootout, several kidnappers were killed; however, Muit was captured. Throughout the trial, various witnesses and evidences were presented by the prosecution while appellants raised defenses of alibi and lack of involvement.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Muit, Pancho Jr., Dequillo, and Romeo guilty, leading to an automatic appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court referred the case to the Court of Appeals for intermediate review, which affirmed the RTC’s decision, commuted the death penalties to reclusion perpetua without parole eligibility. The appellants decided not to file supplemental briefs and adopted their original arguments in their appeal.

### Issues:
1. Whether the RTC erred in finding the appellants guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
2. Whether the RTC erred in finding that the appellants conspired in the commission of the crimes.
3. Whether the RTC erred in giving credence to the appellants’ extra-judicial confessions.

### Court’s Decision:
1. On the issue of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the Supreme Court upheld the RTC’s decision, finding that the prosecution had provided indubitable evidence through witnesses’ testimonies and circumstantial evidence proving the commission of kidnapping for ransom with homicide and carnapping.
2. Regarding the issue of conspiracy, the Court agreed with the lower courts, highlighting the appellants’ respective roles in the crime, which demonstrated a unity of purpose and intention in the commission.
3. On the admissibility and credence of the extra-judicial confessions, the Court found no evidence that these were coerced or procured through torture. The details contained within and the presence of legal assistance during their executions discredited appellants’ claims of torture.

### Doctrine:
– The essence of the crime of kidnapping is the actual deprivation of the victim’s liberty, coupled with indubitable proof of the accused’s intent to effect the same.
– Conspiracy in criminal law entails a unity of purpose and intention among the perpetrators, making the act of one the act of all.
– Extra-judicial confessions, when voluntarily given with legal assistance, are admissible and credible evidence against the accused.

### Class Notes:
– In analyzing kidnapping cases, identify and understand the required elements: the accused must be a private individual who kidnaps or detains another, doing so illegally, and with an aggravating purpose or circumstance.
– Understand thoroughly the legal definition of conspiracy and how collective action or purpose among individuals towards committing a crime implicates each participant fully in the crime committed.
– Recognize the procedural and substantive requirements for the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions, including voluntariness and the presence of counsel during their execution.
– Apply the legal provisions of RA No. 6539 (Anti-Carnapping Act) in cases involving the illegal taking of motor vehicles.

### Historical Background:
This case exemplifies the Philippine judiciary’s approach to dealing with heinous crimes such as kidnapping for ransom with homicide and carnapping. It underlines the importance of cohesive action by law enforcement and the judicial system in addressing and penalizing criminal conspiracies endangering public safety and security. The transition from the imposition of the death penalty to reclusion perpetua reflects changes in the country’s penal policies towards capital punishment.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apply Filters