G.R. No. 211204. December 10, 2018 (Case Brief / Digest)

Title: Goldstar Rivermount, Inc. vs. Advent Capital and Finance Corp.

Goldstar Rivermount, Inc. (Goldstar) borrowed PHP 55,000,000 from Advent Capital and Finance Corp. (Advent) on December 9, 1998. The loan, set for a seven-year term, was secured through a real estate mortgage on Goldstar’s property and a chattel mortgage on its equipment. Goldstar’s inability to meet amortizations led to a dation in payment agreement on May 26, 2000, where Goldstar offered its mortgaged properties to settle the ballooned loan amount of PHP 66,012,292.85. Concurrently, they signed a Memorandum of Agreement granting Goldstar a year to redeem the properties and continue their occupancy for PHP 600,000 monthly rental.

Goldstar later discovered that Advent had previously assigned its loan receivables to the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) on November 24, 1998. Asserting that Advent had thus ceased to be its creditor by the time of the dation in payment agreement, Goldstar filed a lawsuit for the declaration of nullity of the dation in payment in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Davao City. Advent countered by disclosing the nature of its dealings with DBP, particularly emphasizing a subsequent amendment (Amendment and Addendum) to their Deed of Assignment on July 27, 2000, which allowed DBP to manage the loans without declaring Advent in default.

The RTC dismissed the complaint, a decision subsequently affirmed by the Court of Appeals (CA), which agreed with the RTC’s findings on the nature of the Deed of Assignment between Advent and DBP. Undeterred, Goldstar escalated the matter to the Supreme Court via a petition for review on certiorari.

1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the Deed of Assignment was merely for security for Advent’s loan from DBP.
2. Whether the Court of Appeals was incorrect in disregarding the July 28, 2000 letter from DBP as evidence of Advent’s default and DBP’s assumption of creditor status.

**Court’s Decision:**
The Supreme Court denied Goldstar’s petition, confirming the decisions of the RTC and CA. The Court clarified that the Deed of Assignment between Advent and DBP made Advent’s right to enter into a dation in payment agreement with Goldstar conditional on Advent’s default, which was not established. It upheld the contractual provisions that allowed Advent to act in this capacity unless declared in default under their arrangement with DBP. The Supreme Court found no merit in Goldstar’s arguments challenging these arrangements and emphasizing contractual and statutory obligations adherence.

The case reiterates the principle that obligations arising from contracts have the force of law between the contracting parties and must be complied with in good faith. The literal meaning of stipulations controls if the terms are clear and leave no doubt as to the parties’ intentions.

**Class Notes:**
1. **Dation in Payment** – The offering of property to settle a debt, where the creditor may accept it as full payment.
2. **Doctrine of Obligations** – Obligations arising from contracts have a binding effect on the parties involved.
3. **Assignment of Rights** – The transfer of rights from one party to another, with the debtor’s consent not necessarily required unless stipulated.
4. **Valid Contract Requirements** – Consent, object, and cause are essential for the validity of any contract.
5. **Estoppel and Forum Shopping** – Parties are prevented from contradicting earlier assertions or actions if it would unfairly affect the other party who relied on those actions or assertions.

**Historical Background:**
The case provides insight into the complexities of financial transactions and securities in the context of Philippine jurisprudence. The legal issues revolve around agency, contractual obligations, and the interplay between primary and secondary creditors, highlighting the importance of clear contractual terms and conditions. This case serves as a precedent in understanding the rights of lenders and borrowers within secured transactions, especially against the backdrop of assignment deals involving third parties like government financial institutions.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apply Filters