G.R. No. 1442. October 24, 1905

Please log in to request a case brief.

5 Phil. 159

[ G.R. No. 1442. October 24, 1905 ]

REGALADO, PLAINIFF AND APPELANT, VS. MARIA GONZAGA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N



JOHNSON, J.:

This was a personal action brought in the Court of First Instance of
Occidental Negros for the sum of 10,005 pesos and 31 centavos. The
cause of the action accrued upon the 28th day of February, 1885. The
action was commenced by the plaintiff on the 12th of May, 1902. The
defendants plead as a defense to said action the statute of
prescription.

After hearing the evidence adduced during the trial the inferior
court found that said action was barred by the statute of limitations,
and therefore dismissed said action with costs to the plaintiff. We
find from the evidence that said cause of action was not barred by the
statute of prescription, and therefore hereby reverse the judgment of
the inferior court. It is the judgment of this court that the plaintiff
recover of the defendant the sum of 10,005 pesos and 31 centavos,
Mexican, with interest at 6 per cent from the 12th day of May, 1902,
and the costs.

The law governing in this case to which reference is hereby made is
cited and discussed in the causes of Miguel Piccio Araneta vs. Jose
Garrido[1] (3 Off. Gaz., 678), and Jose Pineda et al. vs. Gabino Gasataya[2]
(4 Off. Gaz., 520), and after the expiration of twenty days judgment
should be entered in accordance herewith and the case remanded to the
court below for execution of said judgment. So ordered.

Arellano C. J., Torres, Mapa, and Carson, JJ., concur.
Willard, J., did not sit in this case.


[1] Page 137, supra.

[2] Page 139, supra.






Date created: April 28, 2014




Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post
Filter
Apply Filters