G.R. No. 1575. March 24, 1904

Please log in to request a case brief.

3 Phil. 447

[ G.R. No. 1575. March 24, 1904 ]

THE UNITED STATES, COMPLAINANT AND APPELLEE, VS. LAUREANO MIJARES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N



TORRES, J.:

On December 3, 1902, an information was filed in the Court of First Instance
of Occidental Negros by the provincial fiscal charging Pedro Mijares, Laureano
Mijares, Pedro Git, and others with the crime of murder, in that one Saturday
prior to November 11, 1901, for the purpose of appropriating to themselves
certain lands belonging to Miguel Pastor, and of preventing him from making any
claim with respect thereto, his brothers-in-law, Pedro Mijares and Laureano
Mijares, who were working the said lands, proposed to Pedro Git and Laurencio
Sernal in the house of Laureano, that they kill Pastor, promising a remuneration
of 100 pesos and charging them to commit the crime with clubs to avoid the
shedding of blood by which the crime might be revealed and in order that it
might be attributed to the cholera, which was then epidemic ; that this
proposition having been accepted, Git and Sernal determined to carry it out
about midnight on the said 11th day of November, while Pastor was sound asleep
in his house in Bontot, of the township of Escalante, in that province, in which
house Git and Sernal were living as laborers employed by the deceased; that
Pedro Git struck the deceased a heavy blow on the neck with a piece of wood and
immediately thereafter, with the assistance of Julio Occia, Pastor was bound
with a rope, which had been furnished for that purpose by Pedro Mijares, and
thus prevented from defending himself; that as the result of the injuries
inflicted upon him Pastor died, and his body was buried some hours after in the
cemetery to which it was taken with the assistance of Basilio Situado, Petronilo
Berdaga, and Eugenio Berdaga, of whom the first named was suspected of having
sustained illicit relations with the wife of the deceased, for which reason the
latter, some days before, had expelled him from his house; that Petronilo
Berdaga found spots of blood in the house but did not make any investigation,
thereby giving an opportunity for the concealment of the crime. These facts are
proven by the confessions and the testimony hereinafter cited. On motion by the
attorney for the defendants Pedro and Laureano Mijares, the judge directed that
they be given a separate trial from the other accused. This case was therefore
prosecuted separately from the principal case, No. 386, tried in the same court
in which Pedro Git and others are defendants charged with the same crime of
murder. In that case judgment was rendered April 23, 1903, convicting the
defendants Laureano Mijares and Pedro Mijares and sentencing them to the death
penalty, to be executed in the manner prescribed by the law of the Civil
Commission upon that subject, the payment of an indemnity of 1,000 pesos to the
heirs of Miguel Pastor, and to the payment of one-half of the costs by each
one.

It appears from the record that the defendants Pedro and Laureano Mijares
upon being arraigned pleaded not guilty to the crime of murder with which they
are charged in the information.

The crime upon which this prosecution is based was discovered under the
following circumstances: Maximino Gamao, about 8 o’clock in the morning of
November 12, 1902, went to the cemetery of Escalante to get a carabao of his
which was staked out there, and while passing by a grave he observed spots of
blood on the grass around the edge. The gravediggers who were there at that time
told him that Miguel Pastor had been buried in that grave; Gamao immediately
informed Claro Singson, municipal president of Escalante, of these facts and
that officer immediately went to the cemetery accompanied by Juan Alarcon, the
municipal secretary, the justice of the peace, and Agustin G. Barber, the
provincial sanitary inspector. The statements made by their informant were
corroborated by their own observations and they then proceeded to exhume the
body which had been buried in a grave barely knee-deep. In the grave they found
the body of Pastor, which Avas immediately identified by the persons there
present. The body was found to be wrapped in a mat covered with blood. A hemp
cord was found wound five times around the neck of the corpse, one end of which
was bound to one of the arms. The face of the corpse was bruised and a large
wound was found on the back of the neck, as also other slight abrasions on the
face and one of the hands.

From the medical certificate subscribed by Mr. A. G. Barber, the provincial
sanitary inspector above named, and by whom the body was examined after it was
exhumed in the cemetery, it appears that a deep wound was found on the back part
of the head, the skull having been pierced behind the right ear some two inches
away from the petrous portion, apparently inflicted by a sharp-pointed
instrument; that the nose, mouth, and cheeks were observed to be bruised and
swollen, and certain wounds on one of the hands, which indicated that there had
been a struggle. The inspector was of the opinion that the deceased had been
strangled by means of the cord wound around the neck and that the wound in the
skull, penetrating to the brain, from which a large quantity of blood exuded,
had been inflicted afterwards, the death of the deceased having been caused by
strangulation.

Pedro Git, one of the defendants in the principal case, in which the evidence
shows that it was he by whom the crime was actually committed, testified in this
case that one Tuesday afternoon, which he said was the 12th of November, 1902,
Pedro Mijares asked him to go to the house of his brother Laureano; that he went
there and upon his arrival Laureano asked him certain questions concerning
conversations he had had with Miguel Pastor concerning the latter’s intentions;
Laureano informed him that he was angry with his brother-in-law, Pastor, and on
this account proposed to him that he kill Pastor; that he did not accept this
proposition at first, as he had had no trouble with Pastor, who was, moreover,
his employer; that Laureano insisted and in the meantime gave him several drinks
of wine telling him not to be afraid as he, Laureano, was a member of the town
council and that they could attribute the death to the cholera and bury the body
immediately; that both the brothers so plied him with wine that he finally
decided to accept the proposition; that they then sent for Laurencio Sernal, who
lived in the house of the deceased, and upon his arrival told him that if
anything happened that night in Pastor’s house, to keep quiet, because they had
ordered that Pastor be killed; that Laurencio then said: “I have nothing to do
with it;” that after he had supper in Laureano’s house, the latter and Pedro
told the witness Git not to use a cutting weapon, so as to avoid bloodshed and
that he had better use a club; that they then gave him a piece of hemp rope and
a box of matches so that he might find the place where Pastor was lying if there
was no light in the house,- that by this time the witness was greatly excited
and almost out of his mind, and, forgetting his affection for Miguel Pastor,
went to the latter’s house, struck a match, and saw that his victim was not
lying on the bed but on the floor; that he thereupon struck Miguel, who was
lying on his side, a heavy blow on the back of the neck, whereupon the wounded
man commenced to call for help; that the witness then tied the rope to one of
the arms of the deceased and took several turns with it around his neck, at the
same time calling upon Laurencio Sernal and Julio Occia to come to his
assistance, which they did, holding the deceased down; that he then went to look
for Pedro Mijares and reported Pastor’s death to him, whereupon Mijares went to
the house for the purpose of seeing whether Pastor was really dead, and, finding
him a corpse, said: “Pardon me, brother Miguel;” that upon this Pedro Mijares
and the witness left the house to get some pieces of bamboo, with which they
returned to the house of the deceased; that with this bamboo Laurencio Sernal
made a crate, in which the body was placed after it was wrapped in a mat as
though it were a bale of tobacco; in the meantime they went to the house of
Laureano Mijares to tell him that his brother-in-law, Pastor, was dead; Laureano
ordered them to bury the body at once but did not go to see the corpse nor
accompany them to the chapel; that for the purpose of burying the corpse they
called upon Basilio Situado and Eugenio Berdaga, who, with the witnesses
Laurencio Sernal and Julio Occia, carried the body to the cemetery and buried it
before daybreak, Pedro Mijares having remained in the house to get
breakfast.

The witness added that when he and Pedro Mijares told Laureano Mijares that
Pastor was dead, Pedro demanded of his brother that Tomas Morin, a son-in-law of
the latter, should assist in the burial, but Laureano would not consent, saying
that Tomas was obliged to look after his wife, who was just recovering from an
illness; that the witness had never received the money which Mijares offered
him, because they were immediately arrested; that while he was in the house of
Laureano Mijares on the day in question, Tomas Morin and his wife and some
children were also there but they did not hear the conversation between the
witness and Mijares because they were in the kitchen.

Petronilo Berdaga testified that about 3 o’clock on the morning of November
12, Pedro Git, Pedro Mijares, and Julio Occia came to his house and asked him to
assist in carrying the body of Miguel Pastor to the cemetery, saying that he had
died of cholera; that he declined to go but directed his brother Eugenio Berdaga
to do so; that on the following day, in the morning, upon going to the chapel,
they found this man there without the body, which had already been buried, and
at that time observed some spots of blood on the floor of the house; that Git
assured him that the deceased had been passing blood through the rectum; that he
subsequently heard that Pastor did not die of cholera but had been murdered and
that his assassins had been arrested.

Paulo Sernal testified that on the night of the murder he went to bed with
Miguel Pastor and upon awakening the following morning found that Pastor was not
in bed; that subsequently, when they were all arrested, he learned that Pastor
had been killed and his body buried. Lauren cm Sernal, Eugenio Berdaga, and
Basilio Situado corroborated the testimony of Pedro Git. Sernal testified that
when lie was aroused by the cries of Miguel Pastor, in whose house the witness
was sleeping, there being no light, he sat up and began to feel around the floor
to find the place where Pastor was lying; that when he touched Pastor, Git
struck a light and then he saw that Pastor was dead, with one hand tied to a
rope which was wound around his neck several times; that Julio Occia was sitting
by the side of the corpse, near which he saw a piece of wood about as thick as a
man’s arm; that he subsequently heard Pedro Git state that it was he who had
wound the cord around the ‘dead man’s neck. Basilio Situado and Eugenio Berdaga
testified that they had helped convey Miguel Pastor’s body to the cemetery and
were told by Pedro Git that Pastor had died of cholera; that Git and
Pedro
Mijares went to their house and asked them to render this service, but that they
did not see the corpse, which was already wrapped up when they arrived; that
when they asked Pedro Git about the drops of blood which Berdaga afterwards
observed upon his trousers, Git replied that the deceased had been passing
blood, although they subsequently learned that he had been killed and that his
body was found with a cord wound around the neck.

Apolonio Quintao, a Constabulary corporal, who arrested the accused, said
that after they were all arrested, Pedro Git confessed that they had killed
Miguel Pastor by order of one Guiao, the nickname of Laureano Mijares, who had
offered 100 pesos to have this done, which money was to be paid after the corpse
was buried; that this conversation was heard by several members of the
Constabulary and by Git’s codefendants; that Laureano had also said that Git’s
debt to Miguel Pastor would be canceled in addition to the remuneration of 100
pesos if Pastor was killed.

Tomas Morin testified that about 3 o’clock in the morning of the day Miguel
Pastor was killed, Pedro Mijares and Pedro Git came to the house of the
witness’s father-in-law, Laureano Mijares, and informed the latter that Pastor
had died of cholera.

Upon this evidence, the court below, on the 23d of April, 1903, rendered
judgment convicting Laureano Mijares and Pedro Mijares of the crime of murder
and condemning them to the death penalty, to be executed in the form prescribed
by the law of the Civil Commission,’ to pay the heirs of Miguel Pastor an
indemnity of 1,000 pesos, and to pay the costs of the prosecution. The court
directed that the judgment be sent to the Supreme Court for review. Both the
defendants appealed.

The facts related, fully established by the evidence and by the confession of
the material author of the violent death of Miguel Pastor, constitute the crime
of murder the evidence shows that late at night on November 11, 1902, while
sound asleep, a heavy blow was inflicted upon the deceased with a piece of wood,
producing a serious wound on the back of the neck and, while suffering from the
stunning effects of this blow, he was strangled with a rope wound around his
neck. The assault was made treacherously and with no risk whatever to the
assailant which might arise from an attempt at self-defense on the part of the
deceased. Consequently there can be no doubt as to the concurrence of the
qualifying circumstance of alevosia in the commission of the crime.

The result of the ocular inspection conducted by the local authorities and
the sanitary officer in the cemetery of the town of Escalante, a few hours after
the crime was committed and the body buried; the context of the certificate
issued by the physician as the result of his examination of the corpse, upon the
neck of which a serious wound was found, and a number of slight abrasions on the
face and one hand; and the evidence of strangulation by means of the rope which
was found around the neck—all confirm the testimony of Pedro Git, by whom the
crime was materially executed, his statements being corroborated by those of the
other accused Laurencio Sernal and Julio Occia, who participated in and were
eyewitnesses to the perpetration of the crime.

The guilt of Git, Sernal, and Occia, having been determined in the decision
rendered a few days ago by fhis court, and as this prosecution concerns solely
the question of the participation in the crime of the defendants herein, the
Mijares brothers, this decision must necessarily deal with them alone.

The evidence for the prosecution with respect to the defendants, Laureano and
Pedro Mijares, given the weight it merits in the exercise of sound discretion,
is sufficient to fully convince the mind of the guilt of these two men, who
doubtless conceived the idea of the treacherous1 killing of Miguel Pastor arid
proposed its execution to Pedro Git, of whom they availed themselves for the
commission of the crime, promising a remuneration of 100 pesos.

The explicit and insistent testimony of Pedro Git in which he accuses the two
Mijares brothers as the instigators of the murder of Miguel Pastor, which charge
was first made against them by him when he was arrested and was repeated
frequently with all the details of the conference between Git and the Mijares
brothers, held on the afternoon of the day of the crime, of the flattering
promises they made him, of the conduct of these brothers who plied Git with wine
until he was thoroughly intoxicated and prepared to execute their criminal
design, all the details of the commission of the crime, and the burial of the
body in the cemetery, and the fact that Git immediately notified Pedro Mijares
and subsequently Laureano Mijares that Pastor was Mead, and the fact that the
testimony of Git has not been contradicted on any essential point but has rather
been confirmed by the statements of his codefendants, Sernal and Occia, and by
the testimony of the other defendants who were acquitted, show clearly and
evidently the truth of his assertion—that is, that Laureano and Pedro Mijares
were actual participants in the crime of murder, herein prosecuted as
instigators, there being nothing in the record to induce the belief that the
charge against them is false.

Pedro Mijares, upon being informed by Pedro Git that his brother-in-law,
Miguel Pastor, was dead, which information the brothers were expecting that
night, after their proposition to commit the crime had been accepted by him,
immediately left his house and went to the house where the crime was committed
for the purpose of determining whether, his brother-in-law, Miguel Pastor, was
really dead. He., then left the house accompanied by Git for the purpose of
making preparations with all possible haste for the burial of the body, and for
this purpose requested Basilio Situado and Eugenio Berdaga to assist in carrying
the body to the cemetery. While the bamboo crate in which the body was packed
was being prepared, Miguel Mijares and Pedro Git went to the house of Laureano
Mijares to tell him that the projected murder had been accomplished and the
defendant, Laureano, told them to bury the body at once and refused to send
Tomas Morin, his son-in-law, to assist in the burial.

It appears, therefore, that after Pastor was dead, Pedro Mijares took an
active part in the concealment of the body, while Laureano Mijares, in whose
house the murder was plotted and who proposed to Git the commission of the
crime, got him intoxicated and provided him with a rope and matches, locked
himself up in his house, and did nothing more than direct that the body should
be immediately buried, but without having had the courage to look at the corpse,
as did his brother Pedro. Consequently it appears to be absolutely certain that
both brothers concurred with Git concerning the commission of the crime,
inducing him to kill their unfortunate brother-in-law and be the instrument by
which their wicked plans were to be carried into effect, as the witness has
frequently testified with the greatest spontaneity and frankness.

It does not appear from the record that Pedro Git had any ill will or
personal grudge against Miguel Pastor, of whom he was an employee and in whose
house he was living. On the other hand it appears that the deepest resentment
and hatred existed on the part of the Mijares brothers against their
brother-in-law, Miguel Pastor, on account of the ill treatment he had inflicted
upon their sister, Donata Mijares, the wife of the deceased. Consequently there
can be no doubt in deciding the cause of Pastor’s death that they were moved to
do so by the spirit of revenge. This view is corroborated by their conduct
subsequent to the death of Pastor.

The defendants pleaded not guilty. They, did not testify as witnesses, but
their counsel called in their behalf three witnesses—by name Dolores Labadia,
the wife of Laureano; Tomas Morin, his son-in-law; and Onofre Mondoñedo, an herb
doctor—who testified that they did not see Pedro Git in the house of Laureano at
the time the conference concerning the killing of Miguel Pastor took place. This
testimony in no degree overcomes the force of the testimony given by Git against
Laureano Mijares, for it is not to be expected that Laureano’s wife and
son-in-law should testify to his prejudice or that Morin would testify to having
been present at the time the agreement was entered into between his
father-in-law and Git, together with Pedro Mijares, for the purpose of murdering
Miguel Pastor. With respect to Mondoñedo, the herb doctor, whose testimony to a
certain extent is contradictory to that of Tomas Morin, in view of the fact that
he did not live in the house and had only gone there for the purpose of visiting
some patients whom he said were there, it is very probable that he did not see
Pedro Git, or else was not aware of the latter’s presence in the house.
Consequently the testimony of these witnesses is not conclusive and is not of
sufficient weight to overcome the testimony of Git or even to raise a doubt
concerning it, in view of the fact that it is corroborated by other
circumstantial evidence which, considered with it, leaves no room for a
reasonable doubt as to the truth of the charge.

In the opinion of the court, with the exception of the qualifying
circumstance which elevates the crime to murder, no generic, aggravating, or
mitigating circumstance should be regarded as concurrent in the participation of
the Mijares brothers in this crime as instigators. Consequently the penalty
prescribed by the law must be imposed upon them in the medium degree.

For the reasons stated, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the court
below should be reversed and each of the defendants, Pedro and Laureano Mijares,
convicted and condemned to the penalty of life imprisonment (cadena
perpetua
) with the accessories of civil interdiction and subjection to the,
vigilance of the authorities during their lifetime. Should the principal penalty
be remitted by pardon, they shall then suffer the penalty of absolute perpetual
disqualification and subjection to the vigilance of the authorities for their
lifetime, unless this accessory penalty should be expressly remitted in the
pardon of the principal penalty.

They are also condemned to the payment in solidum and pro
rata
of an indemnity of 1,000 insular pesos to the heirs of the deceased
and to the payment each one of one-half of, the costs of the prosecution.

Judgment will be entered accordingly and the case remanded for execution
thereof, with a certified copy of this decision. So ordered.

Arellano, C. J., Cooper, Mapa, and McDonough, JJ.,
concur.


DISSENTING

WILLARD, J., with whom concurs
JOHNSON, J.,

I am of the opinion that the judgment should be confirmed and the death
penalty imposed. Article 79 of the Penal Code reads as follows:

“Those [circumstances] which consist in the material execution of the
offense, or of the means employed for its realization, shall serve to aggravate
or mitigate the responsibility solely of those who had knowledge thereof at the
time of the act or of their cooperation for the commission of the
crime.”

The defendants had knowledge of the aggravating circumstance of
alevosia, of nocturnity, and of the commission of the crime in a
dwelling house at the time of their cooperation to that end, because they
themselves suggested to Pedro Git that he should commit the crime in the very
way in which it was in fact committed by him.






Date created: January 18, 2019




Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post
Filter
Apply Filters